My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
June 10 South Platte Minutes.docx
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
June 10 South Platte Minutes.docx
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:57:04 PM
Creation date
7/3/2008 4:45:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
South Platte
Title
South Platte Minutes 6/08
Date
6/11/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
consideration now or we would like the opportunity to come back and to present in <br />July. <br />Questions: <br />Harold Evans: Timetable for state wide funding? <br />Ackers: September in order to start project after first of year. <br />Harold Evans: Suggest approach: If each rdtable is being asked for $25,000, perhaps <br />best to come to a consensus that if the other rdtables agree to the $25,000, then we <br />would agree; formal action in July and still meet your time table. Need all four <br />rdtables to go together down the road; this is something we will have to solve; our <br />high quality water is more difficult to find; as a society, this is important because it <br />significantly increases our options to treat lower quality water; conceptually, this is <br />something that we need to support this kind of research for zero discharge. <br />Bill Jerke: Is there not any other research on this around the world that has paved the <br />way, or are we the ground breakers? <br />Dave Ackers: We are the ground breakers; most of the membrane systems have been <br />in coastal states; so far, they have discovered how to put that concentrate back into <br />the ocean or in FL, for instance, deep well injecting; same in El Paso; but we are not <br />aware of any research that is on point for this proj ect. <br />Jim Yahn: If you do not get the funding from the state, this won't go, right? <br />Therefore, should we not make our funding contingent on the state wide basin of the <br />$700,000? Also, which basin will you go through as per the statewide basin funding? <br />Bill Jerke: Brings our attention to the water Supply Reserve Account Summary <br />Sheet: Statewide fund balance: $7,842,970 <br />Bert Weaver: Would request that we reconsider this at our next meeting. <br />Bill Jerke: Appears that we have great interest in this, but that we would like you to <br />come back to us in July with conditions as per approval by other basin and states? <br />Fred Walker: Is there any need in upper mountain counties or is this really more of a <br />need at the lower end of the system? <br />Dave Acker: Some interest in Rifle, but really lower end of system. Pilot project <br />would be in cities of Brighton and LaJunta: <br />MikeShimmin: It would be all four roundtables that would approve to state. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.