Laserfiche WebLink
--Mike Shimmin: Republican River District believes they have enough money over 20 years by <br />which they would lease these same water rights back from the Yuma Cty Water Authority; thus, <br />not talking about new fees to finance this. <br />--Dick Wolfe: Final settlement: promulgating well rules: July 2 and 3 in Wray; then moving <br />forward with compact compliance rules. <br />Post-Dinner Presentation: Sue Morea and Hal Simpson: Task Orders and Consumptive <br />Needs Assessment. (Handouts and email pertain to this presentation.) <br />--Consumptive Needs Assessment; Non-consumptive still underway <br />--Metro and South Platte wanted to look at competition for water supply: <br />--How is project coming together as State-Wide deliverable; add: state wide: non-consumptive <br />and taking demands to 2050 and looking at status of projects and what providers are planning on <br />implementing as per prof ects; <br />--Handout is deliverable for Metro and South Platte Basin; moving into phase to bring this into <br />state-wide basin, looking at water supply alternatives; thus, this deliverable will become the <br />needs assessment per SWSI and now moving into update for demands after 2050; coming within <br />next ew year time rame. <br />--Sasha Charney: Would request that we receive these summaries in a timely manner so that we <br />have time to review and to give comments. <br />--Sue Morea: Note that this is an orientation to the information, you can have as much time as <br />you need; we are not intending to ask for comments today. <br />--Charney: Reiterates benefit of being able to receive these in a timely manner; as per competing <br />water users in basin, seems like this has focus in the north. <br />--Sue Morea: That is because of CBT presence in picture; <br />--Hal Simpson: What we know is that CBT is where the water is and there is none there; no one <br />talking about where they are getting their water; <br />--Mike Shimmin: Also, need to focus on proj ects that are on the board such as Prairie Water <br />where that water is already spoken for. <br />--Simpson: Those are IP&Ps (these are not competing with other projects); <br />--Shimmin: My question is that if all of these projects go online, there will be less water and I <br />thought that would be addressed in this report. <br />--Charney: After you walk through this, how do we respond? <br />