My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Midway Streambank Stabilization
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Midway Streambank Stabilization
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2011 1:12:34 PM
Creation date
6/11/2008 2:53:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
sev_0005
Contract/PO #
PO 08-31
County
Delta
Community
Hotchkiss - Paonia
Stream Name
North Fork Gunnison River
Basin
Gunnison
Sub-Basin
North Fork Gunnison 14020004
Water Division
4
Title
Midway Streambank Stabilization Project
Date
5/5/2008
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
North Fork River Improvement Association (NFRIA)
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Project Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
concept is to allow the river to adjust and find a morphological balance, protection of private <br />agricultural land and irrigation diversions are essential in order to keep bulldozers out of the <br />stream and continue the natural enhancement of the floodplain. <br />Phase II identifies problem sites that need further protection to maintain the objectives of Phase <br />L Funds from the Colorado Watershed Protection Fund were used to construct eight rock veins at <br />two sites; these rock veins stabilize the bai~lcs and encourage natural regeneration of native <br />riparian species. Once the bai~lcs are stabilized there is no need for heavy equipment in the river. <br />Several additional sites which are in need of stabilization have been identified in the river section <br />that was included in the original Midway Project. <br />Cross sections established during that project indicate a recent increase in bank erosion as the <br />temporary measures begin to fail. The design and preliminary engineering for Phase 2 are <br />already complete. The programmatic goal of this project is to complete a segment of the second <br />and final phase of this stream restoration project. Public attitudes and awareness have increased <br />exponentially since the Association began stream restoration projects in 1998 and this project <br />will improve that substantially. <br />Goals, Objectives, Tasks and Costs. <br />Goal 1: Reduce Sediment, Selenium and Nutrients into the River <br />Objective 1: Develop a coordinated constn~ction plan <br />Task l: Field engineering and surveying <br />Cost: $ 1,800 <br />Task 2: Transport equipment, locate material sources and transport to the site <br />Products: 170 tons of rock ready to install <br />Cost: $ 14,300 <br />Objective 2: Implement BMP's <br />Task 3: hlstall rock structures <br />Products: Bank protection and erosion control for 660 feet of the river <br />Cost: $10,750 <br />Goal 2: Quantify measurable results <br />Objective 3: Moiutor existing cross sections <br />Task 4: Survey cross sections, plot and analyze data <br />Products: Demonstrate 75% reduction in bank erosion <br />Cost: $500 <br />Task 5: Establish photo points and determine success of vegetation <br />Products: Demonstrate success rate with willow plantings, write report <br />Cost: $500 <br />We were able to secure additional cash match in the amount of $3,750 from riverfront <br />landowners that was not included in the original project budget. These funds were used to install <br />bai~lc stabilization stn~ctures. The total project cost, including cash match, in-kind donations, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.