My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Colorado Gulch Mine Remediation
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Colorado Gulch Mine Remediation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 9:58:14 PM
Creation date
6/10/2008 2:03:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0021a
Contract/PO #
PO 07-06
County
Lake
Stream Name
Lake Fork Arkansas River
Basin
Arkansas
Sub-Basin
Arkansas Headwaters 11020001
Water Division
2
Title
Colorado Gulch Final Report
Date
5/1/2008
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
Trout Unlimited and the Lake Fork Watershed Working Group
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Project Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NRM Staff and students measuring water quality of Colorado Gulch water. <br />1.3 Methods <br />The following section describes the methods associated with cell construction, substrate <br />recipe design, flow through cells and water quality, daily collection of Colorado Gulch <br />stream water, and weel~ly collection of water quality aliquots for laboratory analysis. The <br />bench scale test was housed in the CMC NRM Atrium (Greenhouse) in order to provide a <br />stable environment for the 8 week period. <br />1.3.1 Bioreactor Cell Construction <br />Each cell was constructed using a HDPE plastic 30-gallon barrel, with a detachable lid. A <br />10-Slot polyvinylchloride (PVC) French drain, 2" outer diameter, 1 3/4" inner diameter <br />was connected to a male coupling with a gasket, and placed through a 2" hole inside of <br />the barrel and sealed with silica based sealant. The bottom 5-6" of each cell was filled <br />with drii~lcing water grade #10-#20 silica sand and covered with a nylon netting. The <br />silica sand held the French drain in place and along with the nylon netting filtered <br />effluent water and aided in drainage. <br />1.3.2 Substrate Recipe Design <br />The recipe for each substrate was compiled from information given by Jim Gusek <br />(Golder and Associates), US BLM, and from previous testing (California Gulch). These <br />substrate recipes were also used in a similar Bioreactor bench scale test run by Karl Ford <br />(BLM) at the Dinero Tunnel. A list of materials, provided by Jim Gusek, included the <br />required substrate quantities of alfalfa hay, cow manure, limestone, wood chips, sawdust, <br />and limestone kiln dust. A Control Cell was also included that had a composition <br />equivalent to the average substrate composition of Cells 1-4. CMC NR1VI acquired these <br />materials from local businesses and contributors for miiumal costs. <br />Each cell consisted of different combinations of the acquired materials in an attempt to <br />determine the most effective metal removal recipe. The cell recipes are shown in Table 1. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.