My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Chipeta Dam Project
CWCB
>
Watershed Protection
>
DayForward
>
Chipeta Dam Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 9:58:13 PM
Creation date
6/10/2008 12:58:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Watershed Protection
Document ID
hr_0017
Contract/PO #
PO 06-53
County
Delta
Community
Hotchkiss-Paonia
Stream Name
North Fork Gunnison River
Basin
Gunnison
Sub-Basin
North Fork Gunnison 14020004
Water Division
4
Title
Chipeta Dam Removal Project Final Report
Date
3/30/2006
Prepared For
CWCB
Prepared By
North Fork River Improvement Association
Watershed Pro - Doc Type
Project Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ASPECTS OF THE PROJECT TO BE IMPROVED & REMAINING TASKS <br />This project was teclu7ically, financially, and logistically challenging. Working with <br />federal agencies is always a daunting task. Since the dam was owned by the US Fish and <br />Wildlife Service (USFWS), they had originally offered to grant money for its removal. <br />However, just weeks before the demolition date, they reneged and said they needed to <br />have their people take out the dam for liability reasons. <br />The Association worked with the USFWS to demolish the dam according to the original <br />layout plans, using the Army Corps 404 permit obtained by the Association. We then <br />completed restoration using the techniques and stil~ctures described above. It is hard to <br />say what could have been done differently to avoid this. We were able to quickly adapt <br />our plan to accommodate USFWS's needs. <br />In addition, a downstream landowner was nervous about what would happen to his <br />property once the dam was removed. The Association immediately held a facilitated <br />meeting with all the surrounding landowners (who had been involved in project planning, <br />but still had some queries) to discuss and answer questions. ki addition, an engineer from <br />the Army Corps of Engineers was present in an additional meeting to assure landowners <br />that the presence or absence of the dam is not a factor in firture damage from erosion that <br />might occur in downstream reaches. h1 the fiiture the planning portion of projects will be <br />improved by obtain neighboring landowner feedback well in advance of constn~ction <br />dates. <br />We are waiting to hear back from one last grant that can be used to remove more non- <br />native invasive weeds from the site. If we do receive the grant, we'll cut the trees this <br />March and then spray them when water levels go down in July. At this point, NFRIA can <br />trouble-shoot any problems that arise during high water and correct them in the fall of <br />2006. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.