My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
minutes_04_08_ark_basin
CWCB
>
Basin Roundtables
>
DayForward
>
minutes_04_08_ark_basin
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/16/2009 4:58:00 PM
Creation date
6/6/2008 12:28:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Basin Roundtables
Basin Roundtable
Arkansas
Title
Arkansas basin 4/08 minutes
Date
4/9/2008
Basin Roundtables - Doc Type
Minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
2. Sub-Committee Reports: <br />• Groundwater Committee: Betty Konarski, President of EI Paso County Water Authority <br />The EPCWA thanks the Roundtable for supporting the conference with a Roundtable grant. <br />The draft report has been delivered to the State Engineer. Marylou walked around and handed out <br />copies of the draft report. Betty asked members to read and comment on the report. <br />Those who attended the Groundwater Conference can attest to the diversity of people and <br />opinions that were generated there. There was unanimity in the belief that aquifer recharge storage and <br />recovery is a timely issue. The Black Squirrel Basin has been identified as a highly potential location for <br />recharge. We're in the midst of a study to determine what that means. <br />What I'm bringing to you is a draft report that has no answers but a lot of questions, questions <br />that will need to be addressed as we pursue the idea of aquifer recharge, storage and recovery. We are <br />very interested in moving the dialogue forward and answering the questions raised by the conference. <br />We're looking forward to your comments, and we look forward to working together on this <br />issue. The report will also be available on the IBCC website. (www.ibcc.state.co.us) <br />• Guidelines for Water Transfers: Lawrence Sena <br />The committee did meet this morning, will meet this afternoon with Jennifer Gimbel, tomorrow <br />morning with Steve Witte, and tomorrow afternoon with Rob White with Arkansas Headwaters Recreation <br />Area, Jim Ramsey with Colorado Division of Wildlife and Dr. David Cooper, Department of Forest <br />Rangeland and Watershed Water Stewardship. The committee is seeking input so they can finalize some <br />of the conditions for water transfers and complete the matrix. <br />• Needs Assessment Subcommittee Report: <br />Jay Winner: Next Needs Assessment meeting will be April 25t", with three to five projects to <br />review. <br />Jim Broderick: Consumptive Needs Assessment. Have gathered almost all the info needed. <br />Should have a draft report for the Roundtable next month. Will bring back for approval in June. It does <br />look like gaps have shifted from original determination. Thanked members for their contributions to this <br />process. <br />• Non-Consumptive Water Needs Subcommittee - SeEtta Moss <br />The objective today is to adopt the map series and methodology as our basic Non- <br />Consumptive Needs Report. Hope folks have had the opportunity to peruse the website that was emailed <br />to them. * This presentation, and the maps created during the assessment process can be accessed <br />from the IBCC website, by going to the Arkansas Basin RT, then to Subcommittees, then to Non- <br />Consumptive Needs Assessment. The model created by this sub-committee will be used by most of the <br />other basins. <br />Questions were asked and discussion ensued. Roundtable members were reassured that the <br />non-consumptive needs information gathered and priorities that were set will not mean that these <br />priorities will be set in stone or become regulatory. <br />This methodology shows how recreation and environment needs overlap. We need to vote to <br />approve the validity of the methodology. This is not a validation or commitment to protect specific non- <br />consumptive needs. <br />Gary asked for consensus. Consensus was reached, and the non-consumptive needs <br />assessment was adopted. <br />3. Presentation: Ag Efficiency in the Arkansas Basin <br />Dave Robbins, Attorney: A compact is a domestic treaty between states. It provides a mechanism to <br />settle disputes. River compacts allocate water consumption. Compacts are federal laws, they are <br />contracts (not able to be modified by one party over the other), and are driven by competition for water <br />supply and the desire of states to have the federal government build major water projects. <br />Mr. Robbins then described some of the history of the Kansas-Colorado Water Compact. It is <br />the youngest compact. Both states recognized that the Arkansas River had enormous fluctuations of <br />water supply. All previous compacts were measurement compacts. Colorado didn't want a measurement <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.