Laserfiche WebLink
MEMO 89.2 <br />2.5.2.1 Analysis of Temporal and Spectral Characteristics of Crops in the SPDSS Area <br />As described in Section 2.4 crop types to be classified were selected by considering the following criteria: <br />(1) crops and acreage reported by the Colorado Agricultural Statistics, (2) spectral characteristics of the <br />crops obtained from expert knowledge and research literature, and (3) input from Consumptive Use <br />contractor on categories of crops with similar water requirements. Based on this information, the <br />following crops or crop groups were classified: `Small Grains', `Dry Beans', `Corn and Sorghum', `Sugar <br />Beets', `Alfalfa', `Grass for Pasture and Hay', `Fallow Parcels' (for irrigated parcels), and `Vegetables'. <br />Although the Consumptive Use Contractor recommended that Sorghum be considered a major crop <br />(SPDSS Memorandum Task 54.2, page 8), the Corn and Sorghum categories were grouped into a single <br />category due to similar growth patterns and relatively low proportion of Sorghum with the South Platte <br />basin (Sorghum represented < 0.2% of all harvested crops according to 2001 Agricultural Statistics). <br />Spectral characteristics of major crop types in the South Platte area, as well as a brief description of the <br />corresponding agricultural practices are included in Appendix C. Figure 11 shows the mean temporal <br />NDVI trend for major crops in the SPDSS area for the year 2001. The analysis of the temporal and <br />spectral characteristics of crops and other cover types used information from reference parcels collected <br />from FSA agencies in 15 counties within the SPDSS area and other sources. In contrast to the spectral <br />analysis for the classification of irrigated lands (described in Section 2.5.1 above), the purpose of this <br />spectral analysis was to determine the spectral and temporal differences between irrigated crop types. <br />From Figure 11 it is evident that the multitemporal Landsat data allows for an excellent discrimination of <br />most of the major crop types. The only two classes that presented a challenge for the MLC algorithm due <br />to their similar agricultural practices were `Alfalfa' and `Grass for Pasture and Hay'. Confusion between <br />`Alfalfa' and `Grass for Pasture and Hay' was reduced in later classification steps and with information <br />from water users. <br />With the exception of the `Vegetable' class, all crops were classified with the MLC algorithm. The <br />Vegetable class constitutes a group of crops that are important as a whole in the SPDSS area but are <br />localized in specific areas. These vegetable crops have very diverse spectral and temporal characteristics <br />due to both their physiology and the agricultural practices associated with them, making them very <br />difficult to classify on a pixel-by-pixel basis. Alternatively, there are spectral, temporal, spatial, and <br />geographical indicators that make the photointerpretation of vegetable parcels possible. For example, <br />spectrally, some vegetable parcels have low reflectance or NDVI values due to the soil background. <br />From a temporal perspective, some vegetable parcels have multiple NDVI peaks during the growing <br />season, indicating the occurrence of multiple harvests or multiple crops. Spatially, most vegetable parcels <br />are small and usually located in certain areas from a geographical standpoint (e.g., along highway 85). <br />Therefore, vegetable parcels were designated manually from information obtained from vegetable <br />growers, FSA, and water users and verified through photointerpretation and analysis of NDVI imagery. <br />In addition to the crops described above, the following two classes were added manually in the <br />classification refinement process as a result of interviews with water users and field verification activities: <br />`Sod Farms', and `Orchard and Tree Nursery'. Because of their distinctive cutting patterns, `Sod Farms' <br />were identified mainly by photointerpretation of the combined Landsat and DOQQ imagery. This <br />interpretation was followed with field verification activities. <br />Page 16 of 45 ~Rlversfde FecAnotogy, fnc. <br />4'JaYer Resources Errgi~ecr:np an~i CansuFlrnp <br />