My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SPDSS_Task62_Review IDSCU
CWCB
>
Decision Support Systems
>
DayForward
>
SPDSS_Task62_Review IDSCU
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2013 9:36:03 AM
Creation date
5/27/2008 11:29:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Decision Support Systems
Title
SPDSS Task 62 - Review IDSCU (formerly SPMAP)
Description
This memorandum provides a review of the IDSCU documentation and functionality.
Decision Support - Doc Type
Task Memorandum
Date
3/9/2005
DSS Category
Consumptive Use
DSS
South Platte
Basin
South Platte
Contract/PO #
C153954
Grant Type
Non-Reimbursable
Bill Number
SB01-157, HB02-1152, SB03-110, HB04-1221, SB05-084, HB06-1313, SB07-122
Prepared By
Leonard Rice Engineering
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Creation of state-wide climate scenario data sets that will make it simpler for the user <br />to develop a scenario at any climate station throughout the state. <br />Comments and Concerns <br />After working with the IDS staff, both IDSCU and StateCU give the same results of potential <br />consumptive use for the modified Blaney-Griddle and ASCE Modified Penman Monteith <br />methods. While no differences in potential consumptive use estimates were found at the stations <br />compared (Fort Lupton and Greeley), the following differences were identified between the <br />programs: <br />With respect to crop characteristics that define the stop and start of the growing <br />season, the IDSCU program uses July 15th as the last spring/first fall date whereas <br />StateCU uses June 30th as the last spring date and July 1st as the first fall date <br />(consistent with NOAA). This may result in differences in potential consumptive use <br />estimates at high altitude stations. For example, if the criterion to start growing is <br />met between July 1 and July 15, then IDSCU may provide a potential consumptive <br />use estimate while StateCU would not. To our knowledge, there are no locations with <br />irrigated acreage in the South Platte that will be affected by this difference. <br />The comparison for this memo was based on potential consumptive use, prior to <br />subtracting effective precipitation to determine the irrigation water requirement. <br />IDSCU allows effective precipitation in excess of immediate consumptive use <br />requirements to be stored in the soil moisture reservoir and subsequently used to meet <br />consumptive use whereas StateCU does not. Therefore, differences may arise when <br />comparing irrigation water requirement estimates as opposed to potential <br />consumptive use. However, based on our experience in the South Platte basin, these <br />differences are expected to be rare due to the relatively small amount of precipitation <br />with respect to potential consumptive use. <br />IDSCU appears to include only the modified Blaney-Griddle method and not the <br />original Blaney-Griddle method (temperature coefficient Kt = 1) whereas StateCU <br />includes both methods. The majority of lysimeter studies throughout Colorado that <br />have developed locally calibrated crop coefficients were conducted using the original <br />Blaney-Griddle method. These crop coefficients must be applied with the original <br />Blaney-Griddle method. Therefore, IDSCU is not an appropriate tool for applying <br />these locally calibrated crop coefficients. <br />Task 62.doc 4 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.