Laserfiche WebLink
4. The roundtable unanimously- weed to rep-ise the .Tune 2006 resolution to recommend that the <br />Grand .Tunction Bureau of Reclamation office manage Green Mountain Resen~°oir. The revised <br />resolution recolrnnends that the reservoir be managed b~ an unprejudiced agenc~~ in a fall and <br />impartial manner. <br />Au~~st 26.2006 <br />1. Presentation by Connie Woodhouse, Tree Rings and Past Flo~ys on the Colorado River. <br />2. IBCC Report: New IBCC subcommittees were created: (1) Needs Assessment Work Group to <br />shld~~ instream flows and water quality, : (2) Education and Outreach: How to get public input <br />back to the IBCC, so that special interest groups do not dominate: and (3) Water Supplti~ Reserve <br />Account Guidelines to determine how to allocate SB-179 grant money. <br />3. Changes to the SB 179 Grant Guidelines ~yere discussed and agreed upon to forward to the IBCC <br />and CWCB. <br />September 25, 2006 <br />1. CBRT Belaws were approved, and the officer slate was re-elected. with no change from the prior <br />~~ear to either the bylaws or the officer slate. <br />2. Subcommittees met to determine potential Water Supply Reserve Account grant applications. <br />~. Stan Lazier recommended that a representative from XCEL energ~~ come to the No~~•ember <br />CBRT meeting to discuss Shoshone power plant operations, and that the CBRT discuss drafting <br />the letter and meeting ~yith Denver after that discussion. Ken Neubecker seconded the motion. <br />and it passed unanimousl~~. <br />October 23, 2006 <br />1. The CBRT report to the legislahlre for 200-06 was edited, with changes stressing that the <br />CBRT believes SWSI inadequatelti~ addressed consumptive and nonconsumptiye needs <br />assessment and, in particular, failed to address energy development's impact on water supply- and <br />availability. <br />2. CDM (Camp Dresser McKee) ryas introduced as the engineering firm charged with performing <br />the needs assessment. <br />3. Group broke out into consumptive and nonconsumptive groups to discuss SB 179 and HB 1400 <br />grant requests, and decided to prioritize these at the November 2006 meeting. <br />4. No motions were voted upon. However, the CBRT members discussed and stated its strong <br />belief that a basin wide needs assessment is needed. <br />Deleted: Z.17im Polsau~If~,Color<xlo <br />~ Basin Roundtable~CBRT`:~008i~00~- <br />~ 03`1v-funrtes Feb ?008 CBRT.doc <br />i <br />~ Deleted: +i'3n_oo8 <br />,~ <br />LLiterbasui Compact ConuiutteeBasui RonndtabksColoiadol\linutea'1\Iimrtey Feb 2008 CBRT.do~ ~ ~i ~~l( ~ <br />