Laserfiche WebLink
collabo~°ative, cor~serrszrs~-based ar~d f rlly defehsible ire terms of zts~ s~ciehtific accz~~•acy, r~eut~•ality arad <br />comprehensiveness. The Plan ~~~ill ackno~~~ledge the connections betw~eejr the Rowing Fork watershed <br />and the surrounding region and ~~~~Il recognize that entities based outside the ~~~atershed have <br />legitimate interests in the valley's ~~~aters ". <br />Finally, as previously mentioned staff has not completed a review of the final Phase 1 report. While this is <br />still a concern the magiutude of this issue is reduced based on resolution of the other issues that were <br />identified by staff in the March 2008 application. <br />Issues/Additional Needs: <br />• Staff recommends that the Scope of Work provide a little more detail for each task outliiung how the <br />task will be completed, and what methods will be used to complete the tasks. <br />• Please provide additional detail on the use and purpose of the "other" budget line. <br />Staff Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of up to $40,000 to assist in completing Phase 2 of the Roaring Fork Watershed <br />Plan. Approval is contingent on successful resolution of the items in the issues/additional needs section. <br />All products, data and information developed as a result of this grant must be provided to CWCB in hard <br />copy and electronic format as part of the project documentation. This infoniiation will in turn be made <br />widely available to Basin Roundtables and the general public and will help promote the development of a <br />common technical platform. <br />Staff would like to acknowledge and express its deep gratitude and appreciation for the professionalism <br />exhibited by the applicant, Mark Fuller. <br />9 <br />