My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00593
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00593
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:42:09 PM
Creation date
4/30/2008 2:44:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Contract/Permit #
14-06-D-7052
Title
Ecological Impacts of Snowpack Augmentation in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado
Date
3/1/1976
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
498
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />c. How would you classify the flexi- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> . , <br /> bilityof the projectl~ structure? very rigid flexible very <br /> rigid flexible <br />d. Since you have been on the project, 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> how much has the structure of the very little some very <br /> project changed? little change change much <br /> change change <br />e. Has the structure become more or less 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> flexible since you have been on less slightly slightly more <br /> the project? flexible less flexible more flexible flexible <br />f. Would you classify the project's 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> administrative structure as very centralized decentralized very <br /> centralized (tall; hie~archical) centralized decentralized <br /> or decentralized (flat; laterally <br /> oriented)? <br />Comments on Organizational Structure: <br /> <br />8. Goal Congruency <br />a. To what extent are your personal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> goals (professional, academic, very close poor very <br /> individual) compatible with close fit fit poor <br /> project's objectives? fit fit <br />b. To what extent are the project's 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> goals or objectives in 'consonance very good poor very <br /> with the University's goals or good fit fit poor <br /> objectives? fit fit <br />c. Amount of responsibility felt by 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> each member of the project for all project substantial professional project leader <br /> achieving project's goals? personnel proportion of project person- feels respon- <br /> feel real personnel feel nel feel sibility, <br /> responsi- responsibility responsibility, other project <br /> bility for and generally other project members feel <br /> project's behave in ways members usually little and <br /> goals and to achieve the feel rela- often welcome <br /> behave in project's tively little opportunity <br /> ways to goals responsibility to behave in <br /> implement for achieving ways to defeat <br /> them project's project's <br /> goals goals <br />d. Manner in which goal setting or 2 3 4 5 6 7 <br /> ordering is usually done. except in goals are set orders issued, orders <br /> emergencies after discus- opportunity to issued <br /> goals are sion with cOlIllI\ent mayor <br /> usually es- group members may not exist <br /> tablished by of problems <br /> means of and planned <br /> group activities <br /> participation <br />Comments on Goal Congruency: <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.