My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00579
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:08 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
An Exploratory Forecast Experiment to Predict Supercooled Liquid Water in the Sierra Nevada
Date
11/1/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />and a value of zero when the rows all having the same <br />proportions when compared to their marginal totals (i.e., no <br />association). It should be noted that the TSS measure of <br />association in an ordered 2 x 2 table is identical to Somers' <br />statistic (Flueck, 1988). <br /> <br />Lastly, the experiment was conducted from 30/12/85 to <br />1~/03/86 (225 possible forecasts) in the first season and from <br />01/11/86 to 07/01/87 (211 possible forecasts) in the second <br />season. However, only about 67% of these forecast opportunities <br />were utilized typically due to one forecaster also having project <br />management duties and to the predesignated "down" days of the <br />experiment. <br /> <br />4.0 ANALYSIS Ai~D DISCUSSION <br /> <br />A. Liquid Water <br /> <br />Table I, Panel A presents the 3 x 3 contingency table <br />of counts and percentages (in parentheses) for the <br />predicted versus the observed LW concentration for the first <br />forecast period of 0-2 hours. We note that 76% of the <br />forecasts exactly matched the observed results (highlighted <br />by the -dotted line) suggesting some forecasting ability. <br />However, this percentage is dominated by the LW = 0 joint <br />cell (i.e., 54.5%). Figure 3 presents this data in a 3- <br />dimensional frequency diagram. <br /> <br />Looking at the marginal percentages of the table <br />indicates there was a tendency to under-forecast the 0 <br />(i.e., 57.9 versus 61.0%) and the 0-.10 rom (i.e., 17.1 <br />versus 25%) categories. Correspondingly, there was a <br />tendency to over-forecast the LW > .10 mm 25 versus 14%). <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.