My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00579
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00579
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:41:08 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:58:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
An Exploratory Forecast Experiment to Predict Supercooled Liquid Water in the Sierra Nevada
Date
11/1/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3 . 0 DATA k'lD STATISTICAL 1.mTHODS <br /> <br />In this article we will objectively evaluate the skill in <br />forecasting the magnitude (i.e., concentration), onset, and <br />duration of SLW, the frontal type expected during the 12-hour <br />forecast period, and the contributions of a selected group of <br />forecast inputs to the final forecast. <br /> <br />Post season frontal analysis was used to verify the <br />predicted frontal type. These analyses largely relied on <br />satellite data and rawinsonde time cross-sections which have <br />been documented by Heggli and Rauber (1988). Verification of the <br />SLW was based on quality controlled radiometer data averaged by <br />2-hour time blocks. The data base used was the 2-minute average <br />radiometer data recorded to tape at KGV. If data were missing, <br />then the icing rate data from Squaw Peak were used by <br />quantitatively translating icing rate into SLW categories <br />(Henderson and Solak, 1983). In the 1985-86 season the icing <br />rate data were used 35% of the time for determining the liquid <br />water concentration but only 9% in 1986-87. (It is understood <br />. . ,~ <br />that the lClng rate dataionly are a crude back-up for the <br />radiometer data.) <br /> <br />The verification analyses utilize the contingency table <br />approach and its summarizations by graphical and statistical <br />measures (e.g., bivariate frequency diagrams, conditional bias <br />plots, conditional probability of detection (CPOD), and <br />association measures; see Flueck, 1988 for more details). A <br />number 0= measures of association are available (e.g., Conover, <br />1971) but the True Skill Statistic (TSS) , which focuses on the <br />residuals from the expected counts due to chance, seemed most <br />appropriate (?lueck, 1987, 1988). This statistic produces a <br />value of +1.0 when all residuals (i.e., observed minus predicted <br />counts) reside on the left to right diagonal of a k x k table, - <br />1.0 whe~ all non-zero residuals reside on the opposite diagonal, <br /> <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.