Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Based on 1980 public financing, 1968-69 labor costs, 1 million acre- <br />feet per year plant capacity, 4,000 MW net power production.. <br />t Assumes power sold at 3.6 mills/kwh. <br />* Incremental cost over the cost of secondary treatment, 30 miliion <br />gallon/day plant capacity suitable for direct hauman consumption. <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Metropolitan Areas <br /> <br /> <br />Columbia River <br /> <br />Colorado River <br /> <br />Second Owens Valley Aqueduct <br /> <br />Southern California Coastal <br />Region Municipal and <br />Industrial Use <br /> <br />Transbasin diversion <br />California State Water Project <br /> <br />Wastewater reclamation <br /> <br />Imperial Valley,. California <br /> <br />Geothermal <br /> <br />75.6*1 Southern California Coastal <br />Region, Gulf of California, <br />Salt Lake City, Utah <br /> <br />Desalination <br />Nuclear <br /> <br />POTENTIAL LOCATION <br />OF APPLICATION <br /> <br />COST (dollar per acre-foot) <br /> <br />TECHNOLOGY <br /> <br />c..g <br /> <br /> COST (dollars per acre foot) <br />ALTERNATIVE SOURCE 1"[,;;:",'.'1 MINIMUM r:::J MAXIMUM <br />Reduction of conveyance losses: ~2. <br />Colorado Basin 42. <br />Evaporation retardation "'.. .:....".~""';;",..":,,,. 12. 24. <br />Vegetative management and rn2. 23. <br />snoWfEmcing <br />Phreatophyte control ~1. 57. <br /> <br />"" <br /> <br />Fig. 8. Alternative technologies for Colorado River water supply augmentation. <br /> <br /> <br />.'''''''''''"",""=C,o~~.~_~____ ~,__._. <br />. n.".'_..,,' ... .___ <br /> <br />._.~ <br /> <br />_n._ '",__ . _ _M _v~ .-~,,,,~,='" <br />- ..--,,",". ...--- -_._----~ <br />-...-- -.. - -" .. _._.._-~ --~~ <br /> <br />I!! <br />