Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SNOWP ACK, RUNOFF <br /> <br />radio communication links to a central headquarters and to each <br />other. The central headquarters would handle the management <br />functions necessary to support the activities of all of the operat- <br />ing districts. <br />Based upon the actual experience of the Bureau of Recla- <br />mation's "Colorado River Basin Pilot Project," we have de- <br />termined the men and equipment necessary for cloud-seeding, <br />operational control, and equipment maintenance in each target <br />area. From engineering experience, we have determined. the <br />spare parts and supplies required for each district. From the <br />expected hours of seeding conditions in each district, we have <br />computed the seeding supplies necessary. We have also de- <br />termined the staffing and equipment required by the central <br />headquarters. Based upon some known and some estimated <br />costs for all of these items in 1971, we have developed a yearly <br />cost estimate of $5.4 million for the cloud-seeding operations in <br />the Upper Basin. This includes amortization of the investment <br />costs based upon an expected 1 O-year operating life. <br />The cost of producing water is the yearly cost of cloud- <br />seeding operations divided by the amount of water produced. <br />We can calculate several different costs <br /> <br />STREAMFLOW <br /> <br />AND <br /> <br />The yearly cost for producing 2.3 million acre-feet in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin would be $5.4 million. The cost <br />of this water would be $2.4 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />The yearly cost of producing 3.4 million acre-feet both within <br />and outside of the Upper Colorado River Basin would still be <br />$5.4 million. However, the cost of this water would be $1.6 per <br />acre-foot. <br /> <br />If four of the least-productive target areas were removed from <br />the system, and only 2.7 million acre-feet of water were added <br />both within and outside of the Upper Colorado River Basin, <br />the cost could be as low as $1.4 per acre-foot. <br /> <br />These costs are significantly cheaper than those estimated for <br />any other known method of augmenting the water supply of the <br />Colorado River (Figure 8) . <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />SNOWPACK, CLOUD~SEEDING, AND THE COLORADO RIVER <br /> <br />salts. By the time the water reaches the Imperial and Coachella <br />valleys of California, it is so salty that it damages some crops <br />such as lettuce, celery, and green beans. The salinity of the Colo- <br />rado River water supplied to Mexico has long been a problem <br />affecting the relations between the two countries. If WOSA <br />could improve the quality of the river water significantly, it <br />would be a great boon to the entire basin. <br />If the additional water produced by WOSA reached the <br />river without touching the ground, it would dilute the water <br />supply of the river with high purity snowmelt water. However, <br />much of the dissolved salts in the river come from natural de- <br />posits of soluble salts that are picked up by streams and ground <br />water. These natural sources contribute about 58% of the <br />dissolved salt in the river flow from the Upper Basin, and water <br />added by WOSA would also pick up natural salts. About 42 % <br />of the salt level is accumulated from irrigated agricultural de- <br />velopment. In recent years the concentration of dissolved salts <br />in the Colorado River at Lee Ferry, Arizona-the arbitrary <br />dividing point between the Upper and Lower Basins of the <br />Colorado River-has been around 600 parts per million. In an <br />average year, the water from WOSA would decrease this value <br />by only 40 parts per million. This is only about half the improve- <br />ment that would occur if the river were diluted by the same <br />amount of pure water. If the WOSA waters were used for <br />irrigation in the Upper Basin, or for some other highly pollut- <br />ing use, the quality might suffer more than if there were <br />no augmentation. <br /> <br />Cloud-seeding decisions must be made separately for each of <br />the ten target areas. For each target area, an organization of <br />men and equipment would be needed to operate, control, and <br />maintain the cloud-seeding activities. To allow cloud-seeding <br />decisions to be made either locally or by a central headquarters <br />these organizations, or "operating districts," should be tied by <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />The Cost of a Full-Scale WOSA Program <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I~~ <br />II" <br />. <br />