My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00536
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00536
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:38 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:53:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Release of Potential Instability by Mesoscale Triggering - An Obective Model Simulation
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. . <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />RELEASE OF POTENTIAL INSTABILITY BY MESOSCALE TRIGGERIHG <br /> <br />An Objective Model Simulatton <br /> <br />David A. Matthews <br />Bureau of Reclamation <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />1. INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />Organized mesoscale systems tend to produce <br />large quantities of precfpitatfon and severe <br />weather. These systems are unquestionably very <br />important to research scientists working to <br />understand the cloud physics and dynamics of <br />precipitation and to operational meteorologists <br />developing better advanced-warning techniques <br />to alert the public to 1l11l1fnent dangers. <br /> <br />Smaller mesoscale systems are important in <br />triggering convective cloud development which <br />often leads to large quantities of natural <br />rainfall. These intense mesoscale systems may <br />be subject to modification to enhance preclp- <br />it<!ltion in regions of high moisture stress such <br />as the High Plains. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />This paper addresses the problem of under- <br />standing the effects of mesoscale triggering on <br />organized nonsevere convecthe cloud systems in <br />the High Plains. Two experiments were deslgn~ <br />to determine if a one-dlmenslon<!ll quasi-time <br />dependent model coul d 11) detect soundi ngs <br />whiCh were sensitive to mesoscale triggering, <br />and '21 discr1min<!lte between cases which h<!ld <br />mesoscale org<!lnized convection and those with <br />no organized convection. The MESOCU model <br />O::reitzberg and Pertey, 1976) w<!lS used to <br />objecthely analyze the available potential <br />instability and thermocb'n<!Imic potential for <br />cloud growth. Available potentfal instabllfty <br />IAPI) is the <!Imount of releasable instability <br />Iposlthe area on a thenuodynalllic diagralll) <br />which woul d exist if the atmosphere were 11 fted <br />by mesoscale or synoptic scale forcing. API <br />may be considered as avaflable convective <br />potential energy. MESCOU was run on rawinsonde <br />observations which have been stratified accord- <br />ing to the existence of observed organized <br />convection (mesoscale triggertng) or isolated <br />convection and clear days. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2. DESCRIPTION OF EXPERIMENT <br />A numerical experiment was performed using the <br />MESOCU ~del to si~late effects of mesoscale <br />lifting on the release of available potential <br />instability. lifting has an effect of desta- <br />bilizing stable layers and advecting or <br />carl')'ing mlsture upward. The numerical <br />expedlllent sflll.llated the atmosphere's response <br />to cases with no lifting, 10-cm S.I lifting, <br />and 20-clII S.I lifting USing vertical profiles <br />of lifting shown in figure 1. Here the magni- <br />tude of lifting is the height 0(111) through which <br />each parcel in the modeled atmosphere is lifted <br />during each hour simulated, so that a 10-Cln s" <br />lifting rate would result in a maximum lifting <br /> <br />16.0 <br /> <br /> 1<t.O <br /> 12.0 1\ <br />~ <br />< <br /> 10.0 , <br /> , <br />~ , <br />r , <br />~ , <br />w , <br />r '.0 , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> '.0 , . <br /> , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> , <br /> .. \ <br /> , <br /> , <br /> > <br /> - <br /> l.O ~ <br /> - <br /> ",. <br /> <br />0.0 <br /> <br />-~ ~.-.- ~ r <br />O. <br />MAGNlTuOL or L II'T IKHI <br />Figure 1. Two prOfiles of lifting used in <br />1II0del1ng ej(pertments which sifl'ljlate <br />10 CIII S.l Idashed) and 20 CIII S.l (solid) <br />lifting at the 70 kPa level (J.1 kill). <br /> <br />, <br />LO <br /> <br />0.0 <br /> <br />of 360 meters at the level of nondivergence <br />(lNO). A level of nondhergence of 70 kPa <br />was assullled for mesoscale triggering in contrast <br />to the synoptic scale lNO of about 60 kPa. This <br />assulllption was based on mesoscale observations <br />indicating IIIOre intense low-level forcing. The <br />numerical experiment was performed on lOB <br />rawinsonde observations taken during the summers <br />of 1976 and 1977 at Big Spring, Texas, and <br />Goodland, Kansas. These rawi nsondes were <br />readfly Available in the Bureau of ReclalMtion's <br />Experilllental Data Neb/ort (Politte et a1., <br />1977) to fnitialize the IIlOdel. SU1IIIIIo1rtes of 20 <br />cloud variables for each cloud and four pro- <br />ftles of total cloud-envi rorllllent effects on <br />temperature and moisture for each case were <br />ell,alllined, This paper considers only four of <br />the cloud variables from the IIIOdel _ cloud-top <br />height, number of clouds supported, total <br />rainfall, and total cloud depth. Identical <br />simulations for modified conditions, using the <br />dynallllc seeding hypothesis, were performed; <br />however, these results are not addressed in <br />this paper (see Matthews, 1977). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.