Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~i <br />f <br />.->;:;. <br />"If <br />~;.? < <br /> <br />.,} ~ <br /> <br />'"r-;. <br />'5: <br />~ <br />;.~: <br /> <br />1: <br /> <br />. <br />'.J~ <br /> <br /> <br />, <br />'. <br /> <br />1182 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 19 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />\ <br />! I <br /> <br />JS.ll <br /> <br />A <br /> <br /> <br />a---- _I'" 1Io1l11l'~1 <br />t-~., IIo,HII' 511 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> A <br /> ,,~ <br /> . , A . . 100'4 <br /> a' . <br />i , . . 50'4 <br /> , B <br /> I <br />J200 I <br />I B C . . 2~'4 <br />I ... <br />I ,a ".A~C <br />, , <br />J , . / <br /> . ,'/C <br /> 80 G\,' . <br /> 60 L~'~~_c <br /> 40 <br /> '~...... <br /> '. <br /> " ,C <br /> 'a <br /> 20 I' <br /> <br /> <br />300 :350 I <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />200 <br /> <br />....... ., .....4 ,h.. 11_'. I_It. <br /> <br />FIG. 6. Numbers of CCs required to reach f3 = 0.10 for a <br />= 0.05 using data base stratified by size and three treatment <br />effects. <br /> <br />. S. Seasons required to detect a treatment effect <br /> <br />Each of the 1977 CC's were evaluated to estimate <br />which would likely have been operationaIly avail- <br />able had a seeding experiment been conducted. The <br />PPI presentations for each volume scan were <br />examined in chronological sequence for each day, <br />and the experimentally suitable CC's were manually <br />selected. To be a suitable experimental candidate, <br />the CC could neither merge nor leave the 150 km <br />radius of radar coverage within an hour of its first <br />echo. Further, candidates had to be separated by <br /> <br />TABLE 1. Operationally available convective complexes <br />at Miles City, MT. 1977. <br />-- <br />--- <br />Radar ~.~ope coverage \-iI Y4 ~ Full <br />Area ef coverage (km2) 8875 17750 35 500 71 000 <br />Area rer gage for 250 gage <br />network (km2) 36 71 142 284 <br />Convl.~tive complexes <br />available: <br />All 103 CC's 19 25 33 45 <br />Smail half 13 18 24 34 <br />Large half 13' 18 24 34 <br /> <br />more than 2 h as it was assumed that only one CC <br />would be treated at a time, and that selection and <br />treatment would require 2 h. The resulting numbers <br />of CC's for the most active fractions of radar scope <br />coverage are shown in Table 1. <br />Interpolation from plots such as Figs. 5 and 6 <br />yielded the numbers of CC's Irequired for the four- <br />gage densities listed in Tabll~ 1. Division by the <br />number of CC's operationaIly available during the <br />1977' season (assumed typical) resulted in an estimate <br />of seasons required to complete a seeding experi- <br />ment. For example, using the~ unstratified data set <br />(Fig. 5) and the probability levds a = 0.05, f3 = 0.10 <br />with 8 = 100%, 10 seasons are required with 250 <br />gages spaced at 36 km2 per gage, 10 also for 71, 8 for <br />142 and 6 for 284 km2 per gage. For these constraints, <br />the optimal density for a 250 gage network would be <br />284 km2 or more per gage; i.e., the gages should be <br />spaced over the entire area of radar coverage. A <br />summary of experimental seasons required for vari- <br />ous conditions is given in Table 2. <br />In those cases requiring ovc~r 350 samples for aU <br />spacings, only a minimum number of seasons could <br />be specified. This was more than seven years for the <br />entire 103 CC sample and more than ten for the <br />two halves. <br /> <br />6. An alternate approach <br /> <br />If the central limit theorem holds and the among- <br />storms plus sampling variances are assumed equal <br />for both seeded and non-seeded CC rainfall accumu- <br /> <br />TABLE 2. Numbers of experimental seasons required to detect ,Il-treatment effect and optimal areas over which to space 250 gages. <br />(Number seasonslarea expressed as fractions of 150 km radius radar coverage with E being the ent:ire area. I implies optimal <br />area indeterminant.) <br /> <br /> 1) = 25% o ,= 50% o = 100% <br /> -~.~-- <br />All Large Small AJ\ Large Small All Large Small <br />103 half half 103 half half 103 half half <br />",811 '" 1I11 '" II/I ",8/1 6/E 10/Y4 6/E 31E 6/Y4 <br />",SII 81E 13/14 ",8/1 3/E 6/14 41E 21E 4/14 <br />",811 3/E 41E ~811 21E 3/\4 liE lIE 21\4 <br />"'811 I OlE 14M 11/'-: 41E 8/Y4 SM 21E 4/\4 <br />11M 51';1 7M ~". 3/E 41'i4 31 'I.! liE 311 <br />. _ Il~. <br />4/~ 21E 31E 1/f lIE 2/',:' liE liE liE <br />/ <br /> <br />IX = 0.05 <br /> <br />/3=0.10 <br />/3 = 0.25 <br />/3 = 0.50 <br />/3 = 0.10 <br />/3 = 0.25 <br />fJ = 0.50 <br /> <br />a = 0.10 <br /> <br />. -: ~.,::-ptt:.;;:"t- .':/,;;,}:'-:-;;r~(I.. -.-L;-",'~;;';1. ;"'<:i:::~HZ.~(""" ~- f .-,,- "-"...<: <br /> <br />:.', .1,tc:, _,~-_.,:: _~"-, ~ .;, -' "._,,::, ~_ ~'...~ ,', ~.,,;.~. ", :", ",: ~<:W~'2:~r~r;'r" ~'~i"_ 7: ~ ._"."~\7-::~':~-~~."~~1!,~~~<<"!':,~ _ ,".;/:-';:- ,14-. ~, :'.;~ ,j,,," ~:;~. ;!,~~."r""'~; <br /> <br />.r,'..'~" ~ <br />