<br />~i
<br />f
<br />.->;:;.
<br />"If
<br />~;.? <
<br />
<br />.,} ~
<br />
<br />'"r-;.
<br />'5:
<br />~
<br />;.~:
<br />
<br />1:
<br />
<br />.
<br />'.J~
<br />
<br />
<br />,
<br />'.
<br />
<br />1182
<br />
<br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY
<br />
<br />VOLUME 19
<br />
<br />1
<br />1
<br />I
<br />\
<br />! I
<br />
<br />JS.ll
<br />
<br />A
<br />
<br />
<br />a---- _I'" 1Io1l11l'~1
<br />t-~., IIo,HII' 511
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br /> A
<br /> ,,~
<br /> . , A . . 100'4
<br /> a' .
<br />i , . . 50'4
<br /> , B
<br /> I
<br />J200 I
<br />I B C . . 2~'4
<br />I ...
<br />I ,a ".A~C
<br />, ,
<br />J , . /
<br /> . ,'/C
<br /> 80 G\,' .
<br /> 60 L~'~~_c
<br /> 40
<br /> '~......
<br /> '.
<br /> " ,C
<br /> 'a
<br /> 20 I'
<br />
<br />
<br />300 :350 I
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />200
<br />
<br />....... ., .....4 ,h.. 11_'. I_It.
<br />
<br />FIG. 6. Numbers of CCs required to reach f3 = 0.10 for a
<br />= 0.05 using data base stratified by size and three treatment
<br />effects.
<br />
<br />. S. Seasons required to detect a treatment effect
<br />
<br />Each of the 1977 CC's were evaluated to estimate
<br />which would likely have been operationaIly avail-
<br />able had a seeding experiment been conducted. The
<br />PPI presentations for each volume scan were
<br />examined in chronological sequence for each day,
<br />and the experimentally suitable CC's were manually
<br />selected. To be a suitable experimental candidate,
<br />the CC could neither merge nor leave the 150 km
<br />radius of radar coverage within an hour of its first
<br />echo. Further, candidates had to be separated by
<br />
<br />TABLE 1. Operationally available convective complexes
<br />at Miles City, MT. 1977.
<br />--
<br />---
<br />Radar ~.~ope coverage \-iI Y4 ~ Full
<br />Area ef coverage (km2) 8875 17750 35 500 71 000
<br />Area rer gage for 250 gage
<br />network (km2) 36 71 142 284
<br />Convl.~tive complexes
<br />available:
<br />All 103 CC's 19 25 33 45
<br />Smail half 13 18 24 34
<br />Large half 13' 18 24 34
<br />
<br />more than 2 h as it was assumed that only one CC
<br />would be treated at a time, and that selection and
<br />treatment would require 2 h. The resulting numbers
<br />of CC's for the most active fractions of radar scope
<br />coverage are shown in Table 1.
<br />Interpolation from plots such as Figs. 5 and 6
<br />yielded the numbers of CC's Irequired for the four-
<br />gage densities listed in Tabll~ 1. Division by the
<br />number of CC's operationaIly available during the
<br />1977' season (assumed typical) resulted in an estimate
<br />of seasons required to complete a seeding experi-
<br />ment. For example, using the~ unstratified data set
<br />(Fig. 5) and the probability levds a = 0.05, f3 = 0.10
<br />with 8 = 100%, 10 seasons are required with 250
<br />gages spaced at 36 km2 per gage, 10 also for 71, 8 for
<br />142 and 6 for 284 km2 per gage. For these constraints,
<br />the optimal density for a 250 gage network would be
<br />284 km2 or more per gage; i.e., the gages should be
<br />spaced over the entire area of radar coverage. A
<br />summary of experimental seasons required for vari-
<br />ous conditions is given in Table 2.
<br />In those cases requiring ovc~r 350 samples for aU
<br />spacings, only a minimum number of seasons could
<br />be specified. This was more than seven years for the
<br />entire 103 CC sample and more than ten for the
<br />two halves.
<br />
<br />6. An alternate approach
<br />
<br />If the central limit theorem holds and the among-
<br />storms plus sampling variances are assumed equal
<br />for both seeded and non-seeded CC rainfall accumu-
<br />
<br />TABLE 2. Numbers of experimental seasons required to detect ,Il-treatment effect and optimal areas over which to space 250 gages.
<br />(Number seasonslarea expressed as fractions of 150 km radius radar coverage with E being the ent:ire area. I implies optimal
<br />area indeterminant.)
<br />
<br /> 1) = 25% o ,= 50% o = 100%
<br /> -~.~--
<br />All Large Small AJ\ Large Small All Large Small
<br />103 half half 103 half half 103 half half
<br />",811 '" 1I11 '" II/I ",8/1 6/E 10/Y4 6/E 31E 6/Y4
<br />",SII 81E 13/14 ",8/1 3/E 6/14 41E 21E 4/14
<br />",811 3/E 41E ~811 21E 3/\4 liE lIE 21\4
<br />"'811 I OlE 14M 11/'-: 41E 8/Y4 SM 21E 4/\4
<br />11M 51';1 7M ~". 3/E 41'i4 31 'I.! liE 311
<br />. _ Il~.
<br />4/~ 21E 31E 1/f lIE 2/',:' liE liE liE
<br />/
<br />
<br />IX = 0.05
<br />
<br />/3=0.10
<br />/3 = 0.25
<br />/3 = 0.50
<br />/3 = 0.10
<br />/3 = 0.25
<br />fJ = 0.50
<br />
<br />a = 0.10
<br />
<br />. -: ~.,::-ptt:.;;:"t- .':/,;;,}:'-:-;;r~(I.. -.-L;-",'~;;';1. ;"'<:i:::~HZ.~(""" ~- f .-,,- "-"...<:
<br />
<br />:.', .1,tc:, _,~-_.,:: _~"-, ~ .;, -' "._,,::, ~_ ~'...~ ,', ~.,,;.~. ", :", ",: ~<:W~'2:~r~r;'r" ~'~i"_ 7: ~ ._"."~\7-::~':~-~~."~~1!,~~~<<"!':,~ _ ,".;/:-';:- ,14-. ~, :'.;~ ,j,,," ~:;~. ;!,~~."r""'~;
<br />
<br />.r,'..'~" ~
<br />
|