Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />47. At the opposite end of the scale of complexity from snoHboards are satel- <br />lite ob8ervations of :mowpack. Although studies of the utility of satellite photo- <br />graphs as a means of snow' surveying have been carried Ollt, present re:301utions are <br />most useful for qualitative asseSDments of snow storago. A quite comprehensive <br />report on the operational applications of satellite snowcover observations has been <br />published (Rango, 1975). Although most of the \-lork reported. concerns use of photo- <br />graphic observations made from LAITDSAT and NOAA sa telli tes, efforts to infer sno\-lpack <br />density from shortHave radiation data are also discussed (HcHillan and. Smith, 1975). <br />Satellit~ telemetry can play a useful role in acquiring precipitation data from <br />remote areas (Kahan, 1976). <br /> <br />48. A related remote sensing approach using airbo:rne detection of natural <br />terrestrial gamma radiation which is subject to attenuation by snOWCO'ier has been <br />investigated in the Soviet Union (Kogan, et a1., 1965) and in the United States <br />(PeCk, et al., 1971). <br /> <br />49. Snow gauges \-[hich operate on the princ:iple of detecting the transmitted <br />radiation from a radj,oactive SOUTce in the 'snol'Tpack have been developed (Sm:Lth and <br />Willen, 1966) and are proving useful in practical 8.1)plica tions, If combined with <br />on-site data processing equipment and telemetry, they make possible remote monitor- <br />ing of changes in the makeup of the snol'1pack. <br /> <br />50. The accuracy of the various sensors available for measuring snow has been <br />studied by the California Cooperative SnO"\'1 Surveys Program since 1965 at the Alpha <br />Instrument Evaluation Site (Peterson and Bro'wn, 1975). A comprehensive diseussion <br />of the evaluations has been ,given by Bro,'ln, et a1. (1976). <br /> <br />VII ANCHURY HYDROLOGICAL CONSIDERATIOli'S <br /> <br />51. There are hydrological aspects of precipitation enhancement that need to <br />be considered .rhether or not streamflow data are to provide the basis for evaluation. <br />There are impacts on the environment due to heavy precipi ta tion .rhich are aecepted <br />as the natural course of events until the time that someone uBdertakes to increase <br />the precipitation artificially. }'rom that moment on, any inconvenient "\'leather is <br />apt to be associated l'Tith the cloud-seeding effort in the minds of the inconvenienced. <br />If the impact goes beyond inconvenience, to the point of hazard or damage, it is quite <br />possible that legal proceedings I'rill be initiated. If redress of the perceived I...rong <br />is not achieved through legal means, sabotage of field equipment used in the cloud- <br />seeding project becomes an attractive alternative. It really does not matter "\'lhether <br />the weather event being objected to \,;as actually associated with cloud-seeding or <br />not, the attitude of some persons affected is apt to be the same unless there has <br />been, in advance, an aggressive programrne to ensure both safe operation and effective <br />communication about the safety of the cloud-seeding operation. <br /> <br />52. To this end, planners of precipitation enhancement programmes are well <br />advised to Ul""1dertake assessments of the nature of impacts that heavy precipitation <br />may have, both inside and outside the target area. These impacts include avalanch- <br />ing, mudslides, elevated soil moisture values, excessive sediment t:cansport, and <br />damaging flooding. Suspension of cloud-seeding activities "\ihenever heavy prec,ipi ta- <br />tion can be expected to produce hydrological impacts requires the prior establishment <br />of monitoring systema and identification of criteria for making the decision to <br />suspend. The more a,fare the affected public is of the existence of these criteria <br />and the more involvement respected local people have in the decision-making process <br />to invoke suspension, the greater the pl'obabili ty of trouble-free operation of the <br />precipitation enhancement programme. <br />