My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00519
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00519
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:31 PM
Creation date
4/24/2008 2:51:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Weather Modification Programme - Precipitation Enhancement Project
Title
A Review of the Hydrological Aspects of Evaluation of Precipitation Enhancement
Date
5/1/1977
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9 <br /> <br />(which included streams in Colorado, Wyoming, and Utah) correlations of 0.9 or <br />better were found in eight cases and 50 record(3 sho.ved correlation coefficients of <br />0.8 or better. Although snovr course observations are intended to provide only an <br />index of overall basin snowfall experience, and generally have only limited applica- <br />tion to the evaluation of precipitation enhancement efforts, they may offer the best <br />practical means in situations where access to a basin is restricted and resources <br />for instrwnantation lind ted. <br /> <br />41. Anyone seriously interested in applying sno"\" survey techniques Viill benefit <br />from reading "Snow Survey and Vlater Supply Forecasting" published bJ' the SO.il <br />Conservation Service of the United States Department of Agriculture as Section 22 <br />of i ts National Engineering Handbook. It is available from the Superi.ntendl?nt of <br />Documents, U,S. Government Printine Office, as Stock No. 0107-0667. The following <br />paragraphs present information dI'a"\m from that document. <br /> <br />42. SnOH courses are lines of sampling points with overall lengths ranging <br />betVieen 300 feet (90 m) to 1,000 feet (300 m) or more, ..rith the end points well <br />max'ked for identification in deep snow. Sampling intervals range from 25 feet (8 m) <br />to 100 feet (30 m). The sampling procedure involves recovery of a complete column <br />of the accumulated snoi,'pack by driving a calibrated duraluminum tube equipped .,rith <br />a cutting head down to the ground surface. Weighing the sampler and the sno..: sample <br />it contains leads to a ,va ter-equi valent reading. <br /> <br />43. Since the snow course observations are intended to be representative of <br />large areas, care in selection of the sampling site is important. The elevation <br />chosen should.be high enouglJ to avoid melting of snow dUTing the snow accumulation <br />season. A gently sloping terrain will minimize biasing the readings due to ponding <br />of meltwater under the snowpack, vri thou:~ making access for sampling too dLfficul t, <br />Small protected mOUl1tain meadovrs, ",here drifting of sno'i:fall is reduced by surround- <br />ing forest, are considered ideal snoVi course sites. <br /> <br />44. ""here "\'linter access is difficult, snow pressure pillows have proven useful <br />as sensors in radio telemetry systems. These are flat, antifreeze-filled fluid <br />containers made of corrosion-resistant metal or 'butyl rubber, covering areas ranging <br />from 20 to 120 square feet (2 to 12m2), Pressur,? transd.ucers, electronic signal <br />converters, and float-activated devices provide the means for both local x'eeording <br />and radio transmission. They work well on level land and slopes of up to ;~O per <br />cent. <br /> <br />45. Although much attention has been paid to the gross errors of measux'ement <br />that can result vrhen precil)itation gauges are used to catch snoVifall, particularly <br />in windy circwnstances (Rostad, 1925), networks of gauges equipped with shields <br />(Alter, 1937) designed to reduce the effect of wind across the gauge opening have <br />proven useful in precipitation enhancement evaluations carried out in Colorado <br />(Grand and Kahan, 1974). Al though shielded prec:Lpi tati<lll gauges kave lltlt pr(Jv8e. <br />par'Ucularly effective in improving the catch of rainfall, their usefulness where <br />the precipi ta. tion falls as snow has been wel1-docwnented. (Rechard and Law~lOn, 1971). <br /> <br />46. Where access for observation after each snowstol:m is possible, snoVlboards <br />have proven useful. '1'hes8 are simple, easily manufactured devices consisting of a <br />squa.re board vri th a (lo"\'lel or steel rod to facili ta te finding after snow has covered <br />the board. The board i.s pla.ced on top of the snoHpack after each storm and provi.des <br />a means of measuring the amount of snOH that has been deposited since the previous <br />reading. The boa:nl should. be large enough to provide a stable base for the vex,tical <br />rod, but light enough to stay on the surface of the previous sn01". Squa:ees 16 inches <br />(0.4 m) on a. side have been popular but the size is not critical. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.