Laserfiche WebLink
<br />APRIL 1990 <br /> <br />311 <br /> <br />DESHLER, REYNOLDS AND HUGGINS <br /> <br />b <br /> <br /> <br />a <br /> <br /> <br />c <br /> <br /> <br />d <br /> <br /> <br />FIG. 16. Photomicrographs of snow crystals collected at KGV at: (a) 1847, (b) 1937, (c) 1947, and (d) 1957. <br /> <br />duced at -60C ICC > 100 L -1 20 to 30 min after <br />release in a cloud with droplet concentrations of 100 <br />cm -3. The errors in these concentrations would come <br />primarily from statistical counting errors and thus be <br />< 10 percent. The droplet size distributions shown in- <br />dicate clearly that ice particles were not affecting the <br />FSSP measurements, and the low liquid water contents <br />and small drop sizes indicate that the 2D-C concen- <br />trations result from ice particles. This ICC is much <br />higher than expected from ice nucleation activity mea- <br />surements at this temperature. Finnegan and Pitter <br />( 1987) and Blumenstein et al. ( 1987) have speculated <br />that transient water supersaturations can increase both <br />the yield and rate of nucleation. Perhaps supersatura- <br /> <br />tions induced by combustion of the acetone in solution <br />with AgI produced excesses of water vapor within the <br />treatment volume. <br />(ii) The seeded plumes dispersed at approximakly <br />1 m S-I, increasing slightly as the particles descended <br />(Table 2). <br />(iii) Seeding produced small compact crystals that <br />rimed substantially before fallout. Growth rates inferred <br />from aircraft and surface observations averaged 0.3 ~m <br />S-I, with a maximum of 0.6 ~m S-I. These agree with <br />the theoretical results of Heymsfield ( 1986). <br />(iv) Liquid water decreased in S2 as the ice crystals <br />grew. <br />(v) Aggregation appeared to be important in one <br /> <br />FIG. 15. Measurements collected at KGV of precipitation rate and surface snow crystal concentrations, size, habit, riming, and aggregation. <br />The PPE for PI-P3 and SI-S3 are indicated at the bottom. The bottom two panels display snow particle concentrations from the 2D.C as <br />a function of size and habit. The top of each shaded region represents the concentration of all particles, ~ to the indicated size, or all habits <br />up to and including the one indicated. The size (",m) and habit of particles are defined with the grey scale at the right. The habits are <br />determined from the images using the method of Holroyd ( 1987). The top panel presents observa,tions from the photomicrographs, with <br />15 min resolution. The symbols are defined as: ( + ) habit observed, (*) habit observed in aggregates. A large symbol ( + or *) indicates the <br />predominant habit. Riming characteristics for each habit are indicated using: O-zero, L-light, M-moderate, and H-heavy. Precipitation <br />rate from a high resolution load cell is given by the dashed line in the top panel. <br />