Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />e, <br /> <br />,.~\d/ <br />.> 's';, <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />,;'':'1 <br />I <br />~ <br />~j <br />, <br />~l <br />:"1 <br /> <br />;j <br />t.;.; <br />i~' <br /> <br />;.;. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />,.'4, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />'J e <br />t <br />, <br /> <br />~~, <br />a. <br />,:\~ <br />~j, <br />i~ <br />[. , <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />The horizontal gradient, cross-isentropic winds <br />and vertical isentropic gradient for each element <br />are then entered into~n ~lgorithm which estimates <br />the average vertical veloc1ty cross-isentropic <br />~ponent. Figure 4 offers examples of the resur <br />tant f1eld for two cases, Th$-Yertical velocities <br />are then used as input to MESOCU which d' ses <br />the resu 1ng a1 a e tential instabi 1 <br />The mo e re ates convective cloud <br />.development. <br /> <br /> <br /> -- r--.. '-' <br />. -1.5 .... ',2 ..... . .U.t "'U.J -25.' -Ll.1 <br /> . . .. <br />. . . <br />.L..5 "').1 "+1.3 -1.1. "'13.3 _1.Q "14.6 "CIi.] <br /> . . . . <br />.. .. . . <br />"'1.1 -)..-' -l.t "')..2 .:ZO.J .L2..' "'1'.1 .'.' <br /> .. . . . ... . . <br />. . <br /> .... .... <br />-.' -,' -l.2 -l~ ..,. -U.J -U.l -10.2 <br /> . . . <br />. . . . <br />0,0 ..t5.1 -z.o <br /> '. t;:\ . <br /> '. <br /> AIafu& 24 :U~~~ ~:_'_..~O QIf" <br /> <br />Figure 4. Computed vertical velocities <br />and grid element mid-point positions for 2 cases. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />NUMERICAL MODEL EXPERIMENT <br /> <br />A relatively simple quasi-time depen- <br />dent numerical model of cloud-environment inter- <br />action ~SOC!n. developed by Krei tzberg and Perkey <br />~is used in this study to diagnose convec- <br />tive potential for cloud growth. The model simu- <br />lates cloud growth by Lagrangian parcel dynamics <br />using Stommel (1951) entrainment with the effects <br />of water loading and cloud-environment mixing to <br />damp thermal buoyancy, It includes the environ- <br />mental controls of solar heating and surface eddy <br />mixing in the planetary boundary layer~ and <br />the effect of meso-synoptic scale lift1ng on <br />convective thermodynamics. The model also simu- <br />lates the local microphysical impact of precip- <br />itation - evaporation in the dry sub-cloud layer <br />which modifies the environment for further con- <br />vection by COOling and mOistening the@L:' ) <br /> <br />A numerical experiment was performed <br />using the MESOCU model to simulate effects of <br />mesoscale lifting on the release of available <br />potential instability. Lifting has an effect of <br />destabilizing stable layers and advecting or carry- <br />ing moisture upward. The numerical experiment sim- <br />u~at:d the atmosE~er:'s,response to case~lwith no <br />Ilftlng, 10 em s 11ftlng, and 20 cm s lifting <br />using vertical profiles of lifting, Here the mag- <br />nitude of lifting is the height (km) through which <br />each parcel in the modeled atmosphere is lifte~ <br />during each hour simulated, so that a 10 em s- <br />lifting rate would result in a maximum li~ of <br />360 meters at the ~E!l_.9!....n.ond.iv,er.gence ~LND1J <br />A level of nondivergence of 70 kPa was assumed for <br />mesoscal~ triggering in contrast to the synoptic <br />scale~of about 60 kPa. This assumption was <br />based on mesoscale observations indicating more <br /> <br />intense low-level forcing. The numerical exper- <br />iment was performed on 3 rawinsonde observations <br />taken dur ffig the summers of T977'ancl-T9~ --' <br />~dland, Kansas. These raw1nsondes were ava11- <br />able in real time in the Bureau of Reclamation's <br />Environmental Data Network (Politte et al., 1977) <br />to initialize the model. Summaries of 20 cloud <br />var iables for each cloud and four pl:ofiles of <br />total cloud-environment effects on temperature and <br />moisture for each case were examined. This paper <br />considers only four of the cloud val: iables from <br />the model - cloud-top height, number of clouds <br />supported, cloud base height and total cloud depth. <br />Identical simulations for modified conditions, <br />using the dynamic seeding hypothesis, were per- <br />formed; however, these results are not addressed <br />in the paper (see Matthews, 1977), <br /> <br />The rawinsonde observations used to <br />initialize the model simulations wel:e selected <br />from three typical convective day. illh eitheL- (1) <br />esosca e organlzed convection, which indicates <br />'tl; existence of a mesoscale-tr1ggel:ing mechanism <br />likely to result in lifting, or (2) isolated ~ <br />random convective clouds or clear skies. GOES-TAP <br />(Corbell, 1976) satellite imagery was used to vis- <br />ually classify each day on a 150 km grid (fig. 4). <br />Then all model. results were verified according to <br />observed cloud types and mesoscale triggering. <br /> <br />One example of a mesoscale-triggered <br />.case is presented to show important effects of <br />lifting on the release of available potential in- <br />stability and show how this isentropic analysis <br />teChnique may be used with the model to quanti- <br />tatively forecast thunderstorm development. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />RESULTS AND VERIFICATIrn~ <br /> <br />5.1 <br /> <br />General Summary <br /> <br />Six cases were examined for this pre- <br />liminary study. Three of the cases were used in <br />I1ESOCU analysis. The days are summarized by <br />exc:erpts from the operations log: <br /> <br />May 24, 1977 <br /> <br />The intensive thunderstorm activity <br />occurred after 1800 MDT (0000 GMT) l"h,m a cluster <br />of cells developed in southeastern Colorado. The <br />cells were moving toward the northe;~sl:. New cells <br />were growing along the southeast qu,~dl.ant of the <br />cluster and were developing on the ,,,indward side <br />of the low-level (surface) flow. <br /> <br />June 2, .1977 <br /> <br />Thunderstorm cells developed north- <br />northeast of Limon, Colorado and moved eastward <br />after 1500 MDT (2100 GMT). The cells gradually <br />moved toward Goodland and were within 40 km by <br />2000 MDT (0200 GMT). The cluster intensified at <br />this time and continued to move slm}l? eastward <br />throughout the nighttime hours. <br /> <br />July 2, 1977 (f1ESOCU Stu,~ I <br /> <br />Isolated small cumulus fo.:med 50 to <br />100 km west of Goodland at approxim~t~ly 1500 MDT <br />(2100 GMT). These cells did not grow substantially. <br />Major activity to the southwest after 1800 i4DT <br /> <br />L81 <br /> <br />-"'" <br />