Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 35 <br /> <br />1442 <br />150 <br />" <br />" " <br />~100 " <br />e:. <br />~ . <br />. <br />~ <br />< so <br /> ,," <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />" <br />" <br /> <br />. . . <br />. . *:-. <br /> <br />o <br />2100 2200 <br /> <br />2300 2400 2500 2600 <br />AL1Tl'UDE (M) <br /> <br />FIG. 10. Average SF6 concentrations plotted with respect to altitude <br />for all SF6 plume penetrations from site 7 along the valley track. <br /> <br />can see that it is sampling a different portion of the <br />wave at different altitudes. If the waves are vertically <br />in phase (stacked vertically), the assumption is made <br />that the wave has the same vertical velocities and the <br />same position directly below the altitude from which it <br />was sampled. This is much like what is shown in Fig. <br />4 for the first two streamlines above the mountain, be- <br />tween 2 and 4 kIn. At higher altitudes the waves are no <br />longer in phase but tilt upwind with height. However, <br />it should be remembered that for this study we are only <br />interested in the lowest 1000 m above the crest and can <br />disregard anything above 3.2 kIn. <br /> <br />2700 <br /> <br />It is necessary, however, to determine the temporal <br />stability of these lee-wave characteristics if we are to <br />determine their effects on particle trajectories from <br />storm to storm or within individual storms. Lee waves <br />are known to change their wavelength and amplitude <br />based on changing winds and atmospheric stability. To <br />determine the magnitude of these changes, soundings <br />were analyzed from the last several winter field seasons <br />using the technique shown in Fig. 5. In analyzing these <br />plots, two recurring patterns appeared. Pattern 1 is rep- <br />resented in Fig. 7. The two cases included from 1992 <br />were days when SF6 was observed to descend rapidly <br />into the valley, as observed using an SF6 detector <br />mounted in a van (Reynolds 1992). Several hundred <br />parts per trillion of SF6 were observed on 5 March in <br />the valley. This was one of the largest concentrations <br />observed during the several winter seasons in which <br />tracer releases were made. In these situations, the <br />strong downdraft is followed by a strong updraft as the <br />balloon begins to pass over the downwind ridge. <br />The wave velocity pattern shown in Fig. 7 appears <br />to occur most frequently prior to the passage of the <br />surface cold front in moderate to strong southerly to <br />southwesterly winds, as determined from the three <br />mountaintop weather stations. Bruintjes et al. (1994) <br />observed a similar relationship over the Mogollon Rim <br />of Arizona. In fact, the stronger the winds near the ridge <br />top (inferred from the rapid downwind displacement of <br />the balloon just after launch), the more intense the <br />downdraft, as was shown for 17 February 1994. <br /> <br /> TABLE 4. Site 9 SF6 plume characteristics observed by aircraft for the valley track. <br /> Plume <br /> width <br /> Dist. site 9 Max SF6 Avg SF6 Alt Temp Avg LWC Wind speed Wind direction <br />Date Pass e) (Ian) (Ian) (ppt) (ppt) (m) (oC) (g m-3) (m S-I) ("1') <br />17 February 11 15 5 19.5 57 19 2472 -6.6 0.07 18 184 <br />17 February 13 14 4.8 19.2 89 36 2479 -6.5 0.14 15 181 <br />17 February 15 15 5.1 19.4 86 26 2478 -6.2 0.12 17 184 <br />. 2 March 8 13 4.1 18.0 68 29 2273 2.9 0.00 8 228 <br />2 March 9 22 6.6 17.2 133 58 2267 2.8 0.00 na na <br />2 March 10 32 11 18.9 135 46 2145 4.0 0.00 8 217 <br />2 March 11 38 11 16.0 140 44 2145 3.8 0.00 7 198 <br />9 March 5 10 3.1 17.7 100 43 2163 6.0 0.00 10 200 <br />9 March 6 19 5.6 17.1 271 70 2229 5.4 0.00 8 205 <br />9 March 7 17 5.3 17.4 182 80 2285 5.0 0.00 11 212 <br />9 March 8 19 6 17.7 130 64 2375 4.2 0.00 10 218 <br />9 March 9 28 9.1 18.0 124 64 2346 4.5 0.00 9 217 <br />9 March 11 19 6 17.5 92 40 2400 4.3 0.00 6 227 <br />9 March 13 12 3.5 17.6 15 6 2484 3.1 0.00 8 222 <br />16 March 5 13 3.9 17.4 33 12 2533 0.7 0.16 16 218 <br />19 March 7 7 2.2 17.4 38 20 2480 3.7 0.00 13 209 <br />19 March 11 11 3.4 17.4 50 28 2178 4.7 0.00 11 229 <br />19 March 12 9 2.6 17.2 24 11 2317 3.6 0.00 10 204 <br />19 March 13 5 1.4 17.3 24 11 2476 3.3 0.00 15 215 <br />Average 17 5.2 17.6 93 36 2352 2.2 0.03 11 208 <br />