My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00481
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00481
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:40:08 PM
Creation date
4/23/2008 1:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Managing Snowpack Augmentation Research
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />In 1973 the OARH budget included funds for 44 contracts ,or agree- <br />ments with research groups and data collecting agencies. Field programs <br />were underway or being planned at l6 sites, lO ol which ~~re for winter <br />orographic research (see Figure l). In addition to the field experiments, <br />a variety of groups were hard at work seeking answers to questions rang- <br />ing from ecological impacts to economic benefits. Dr. Archie M. Kahan, <br />Chief of OAR.J.'1, said, "He appeared to be well on our \-lay toward aehieving <br />the seemingly desirable goal of developing the technology for adding to <br />the nation's water resources in an economically feasible and socially <br />accepatable way" (1). <br /> <br />I I <br /> <br />I <br />,. <br /> <br />The FY 1974 budget was impacted by a different administrative per- <br />ception of managing western water resources. Emphasis shifted from aug- <br />mentation of water resources to improved management and conservation of <br />existing water supplies. The Project Skywater budget was reduced to <br />$3.9 million, forcing termination or drastic reduction of many ongoing <br />research efforts. A congressional directive to plan and mount a new <br />experimental effort designed to reduce the scientific imcertainties of <br />seeding summer cumulus clouds in the High Plains added to the difficulty <br />of maintaining a large orographic research program. The new project, <br />called HIPLEX (the High Plains Cooperative Program), was to account for <br />the use of over half the Project Skywater funds for many years into the <br />future. Management decisions made to reduce a large-scale effort invo v- <br />ing a large number of dedicated people are much more difficult than <br />those required to expand a program. The decisions on how to adjust Pro- <br />ject Skywater were based on a combination of factors including area need, <br />expected return, technology advancement, and political support. <br /> <br />'! <br /> <br />:; <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />, <br />'I <br />I <br />Ii <br />" <br /> <br />THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN PILOT PROJECT <br /> <br />LI <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />I <br />r .1 <br />I I <br />I <br />t <br />I <br />1 <br />. \ <br />f <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />The CRBPP (Colorado River Basin Pilot Project), a randomized winter <br />orographic seeding experiment located in the San Juan Mountains of south- <br />west Colorado, was judged to most closely meet the desired requirements <br />for a large research project. The Colorado River Basin is projected to <br />encounter the most severe water shortages of any major area within the <br />United States. The Colorado River Basin Project Act of 1968 directed the <br />.Secretary of Interior to investigate means of water augmentation, includ- <br />ing weather modification. The CRBPP was designed by scientists at Colo- <br />r~do State University and modeled after the Climax, Colorado experiment <br />which had a positive evaluation. Widespread water user support to con- <br />tinue the research was also evident in the Basin. <br /> <br />Field operations were concluded on the CRBPP 1n 1975 after 5 winter <br />seasons of.randomized seeding. Final analysis of the project was com- <br />pleted in 1976 by Aerometric Research, Inc. The analysis was complicated <br />by difficulties encountered in forecasting storms in advance for 24-hour <br />experimental periods. Many unsuitable clouds 'were seeded; and little or <br />no snow fell on some experimental days. It was also discovered that, in <br />numerous cases, seeding material remained in the project area longer than <br />the planned seeding period. This resulted in contamination of experimen- <br />tal periods randomly selected as no-seed cases. <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />"As a result, the total unstratified statistic&l analysis found, <br />no difference between precipitation on seeded experimental days <br />and control days. However, when days of missed forecasts were <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />Foehner <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.