<br />494
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />4) VEGETATION
<br />
<br />With respect to the vegetational characteristics of the
<br />environment, increasing summer-convective precipita-
<br />tion is accompanied by a gradual transition from desert
<br />shrubland, to short-grass prairie, to tall-grass prairie, to
<br />a saban a of mixed grass and deciduous forest, and
<br />finally to forest. This transition has, of course, been
<br />drastically modified by cultivation and land use, by
<br />irrigated cropland and grazing in the drier part, and by
<br />dryland crops and row crops in the progressively moister
<br />parts. Precipitation management would tend to shift
<br />the very diffuse boundaries of these grand divisions
<br />somewhat westward.
<br />Each vegetational province is characterized by a spec-
<br />trum of plant species, including many specimens of
<br />species adaptable to both wetter and drier climates and
<br />warmer and colder climates. With the normal short- and
<br />middle-term variations in climate, both relative and
<br />absolute abundance of different species often vary greatly
<br />from one epoch to another, but the absolute range of
<br />most species is little affected. Thus, it was found that
<br />during the drought of the 1930s the more moist-adapted
<br />species were suppressed over wide areas but did not
<br />disappear. When the drought ended, the dry-adapted
<br />species, which had suffered less, at first grew exuberantly
<br />but were later crowded down and suppressed (but not
<br />extinguished) by recovery of the moist-adapted species.
<br />Precipitation management, to the extent that it may
<br />moderate the intensity of extreme droughts, will cause
<br />the natural vegetation of each locality gradually to
<br />resemble that of regions now slightly moister and may
<br />moderate the secular changes in species composition
<br />that take place in response to normal climatic fluctua-
<br />tions.
<br />Respecting vegetation, it should be noted that ac-
<br />culturation has profoundly modified species composition
<br />and may continue to do so. Overgrazing of the High
<br />Plains in the late 19th century resulted in drastic and
<br />apparently permanent change in the species composi-
<br />tion of the grassland communities, with disappearance
<br />of the forage species preferred by the cattle and, in
<br />many places, displacement of grasses by desert shrubs
<br />and forbs. In some moister locations, the original spe-
<br />cies structure has been supplanted or greatly modified
<br />by the introduction of improved pasture grasses. It is
<br />highly probable that such cultural practices will con-
<br />tinue to exert much greater influence upon the char-
<br />acter of vegetational communities than will precipita-
<br />tion management and will probably entirely mask the
<br />latter.
<br />
<br />5) ANIMAL POPULATIONS
<br />
<br />The effect of precipitation management on animal pop-
<br />ulations is likely to be mainly indirect, through its
<br />influence on habitat, rather than directly on the or-
<br />ganisms. Particularly in the case of birds and small
<br />mammals, populations depend more on the presence of
<br />suitable cover, nest sites, and food supplies than on the
<br />weather. Though severe storms at critical times may
<br />occasionally decimate some'species, there is little expec-
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Vol. 58, No.6, June 1977
<br />
<br />tation that preCIpItation management would affect the
<br />frequency of such occurrences.
<br />Although it has been proposed that outbreaks of
<br />disease, weeds, and insect pests are facilitated by any
<br />major ecosystem disturbance, the interaction between
<br />the environment and precipitation management will
<br />effect only gradual change and adjustment. It will not
<br />cause disturbances like those of acculturation or like a
<br />multitude of natural acute disturbances such as fire and
<br />drought. In fact, to the extent that precipitation man-
<br />agement reduces the intensity of drought, an important
<br />source of ecosystem stress will be diminished.
<br />
<br />6) SUMMARY
<br />
<br />The best expectation presently available of the impact
<br />of summer-convective precipitation management is that
<br />each present environmental compartment would gradu-
<br />ally come to resemble neighboring compartments on the
<br />moister side of the precipitation gradient, with no ap-
<br />parent risk of severe disturbances accompanying this
<br />transition.
<br />
<br />d. Impact on the natural environment-
<br />Winter orograPhic
<br />
<br />The setting for winter-orographic preCIpItation manage-
<br />ment, comprised mostly within the more remote parts
<br />of mountain ranges, is affected less by acculturation than
<br />are other regions. Nevertheless, such activities as lum-
<br />bering, mining, livestock grazing, game management,
<br />recreational development, and fire protection have al-
<br />ready greatly modified the aboriginal environment and
<br />continue to do so.
<br />By virtue of the environmental impact studies begun
<br />in the early 1970s in connection with Skywater winter-
<br />orographic experiments and recently reported upon, the
<br />relationship of snowpack augmentation to certain pro-
<br />cesses considered to be most significant environmentally
<br />has been established or at least estimated.
<br />
<br />I) SNOW COVER EXTENT AND DURATION
<br />
<br />The most important impact of precipitation manage-
<br />ment, through which other environmental compart-
<br />ments are affected, is on the extent and duration of
<br />snow cover as it retreats in the spring. The snow cover
<br />release date establishes the beginning of soil warming
<br />and of the growing season for most vegetation and may
<br />affect the duration of adequate moisture supply for
<br />growth. From Forest Service studies, it appears that a
<br />snowpack 150% of normal delays the disappearance of
<br />snow cover at a given location by "-'5 days, leading to
<br />an estimate of 1-3 days' delay resulting from precipita-
<br />tion management. This estimate is probably too high
<br />for windswept areas and too low for the much smaller
<br />areas where snowdrifts accumulate.
<br />
<br />2) AVALANCHE HAZARD
<br />
<br />The relation between snowpack augmentation and
<br />avalanche hazard is greatly complicated by other factor>
<br />affecting the release of avalanches and affecting the
<br />prediction, warning, and application of countermeasures
<br />that mitigate this hazard. In chutes where they seldom
<br />
|