Laserfiche WebLink
<br />494 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />4) VEGETATION <br /> <br />With respect to the vegetational characteristics of the <br />environment, increasing summer-convective precipita- <br />tion is accompanied by a gradual transition from desert <br />shrubland, to short-grass prairie, to tall-grass prairie, to <br />a saban a of mixed grass and deciduous forest, and <br />finally to forest. This transition has, of course, been <br />drastically modified by cultivation and land use, by <br />irrigated cropland and grazing in the drier part, and by <br />dryland crops and row crops in the progressively moister <br />parts. Precipitation management would tend to shift <br />the very diffuse boundaries of these grand divisions <br />somewhat westward. <br />Each vegetational province is characterized by a spec- <br />trum of plant species, including many specimens of <br />species adaptable to both wetter and drier climates and <br />warmer and colder climates. With the normal short- and <br />middle-term variations in climate, both relative and <br />absolute abundance of different species often vary greatly <br />from one epoch to another, but the absolute range of <br />most species is little affected. Thus, it was found that <br />during the drought of the 1930s the more moist-adapted <br />species were suppressed over wide areas but did not <br />disappear. When the drought ended, the dry-adapted <br />species, which had suffered less, at first grew exuberantly <br />but were later crowded down and suppressed (but not <br />extinguished) by recovery of the moist-adapted species. <br />Precipitation management, to the extent that it may <br />moderate the intensity of extreme droughts, will cause <br />the natural vegetation of each locality gradually to <br />resemble that of regions now slightly moister and may <br />moderate the secular changes in species composition <br />that take place in response to normal climatic fluctua- <br />tions. <br />Respecting vegetation, it should be noted that ac- <br />culturation has profoundly modified species composition <br />and may continue to do so. Overgrazing of the High <br />Plains in the late 19th century resulted in drastic and <br />apparently permanent change in the species composi- <br />tion of the grassland communities, with disappearance <br />of the forage species preferred by the cattle and, in <br />many places, displacement of grasses by desert shrubs <br />and forbs. In some moister locations, the original spe- <br />cies structure has been supplanted or greatly modified <br />by the introduction of improved pasture grasses. It is <br />highly probable that such cultural practices will con- <br />tinue to exert much greater influence upon the char- <br />acter of vegetational communities than will precipita- <br />tion management and will probably entirely mask the <br />latter. <br /> <br />5) ANIMAL POPULATIONS <br /> <br />The effect of precipitation management on animal pop- <br />ulations is likely to be mainly indirect, through its <br />influence on habitat, rather than directly on the or- <br />ganisms. Particularly in the case of birds and small <br />mammals, populations depend more on the presence of <br />suitable cover, nest sites, and food supplies than on the <br />weather. Though severe storms at critical times may <br />occasionally decimate some'species, there is little expec- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Vol. 58, No.6, June 1977 <br /> <br />tation that preCIpItation management would affect the <br />frequency of such occurrences. <br />Although it has been proposed that outbreaks of <br />disease, weeds, and insect pests are facilitated by any <br />major ecosystem disturbance, the interaction between <br />the environment and precipitation management will <br />effect only gradual change and adjustment. It will not <br />cause disturbances like those of acculturation or like a <br />multitude of natural acute disturbances such as fire and <br />drought. In fact, to the extent that precipitation man- <br />agement reduces the intensity of drought, an important <br />source of ecosystem stress will be diminished. <br /> <br />6) SUMMARY <br /> <br />The best expectation presently available of the impact <br />of summer-convective precipitation management is that <br />each present environmental compartment would gradu- <br />ally come to resemble neighboring compartments on the <br />moister side of the precipitation gradient, with no ap- <br />parent risk of severe disturbances accompanying this <br />transition. <br /> <br />d. Impact on the natural environment- <br />Winter orograPhic <br /> <br />The setting for winter-orographic preCIpItation manage- <br />ment, comprised mostly within the more remote parts <br />of mountain ranges, is affected less by acculturation than <br />are other regions. Nevertheless, such activities as lum- <br />bering, mining, livestock grazing, game management, <br />recreational development, and fire protection have al- <br />ready greatly modified the aboriginal environment and <br />continue to do so. <br />By virtue of the environmental impact studies begun <br />in the early 1970s in connection with Skywater winter- <br />orographic experiments and recently reported upon, the <br />relationship of snowpack augmentation to certain pro- <br />cesses considered to be most significant environmentally <br />has been established or at least estimated. <br /> <br />I) SNOW COVER EXTENT AND DURATION <br /> <br />The most important impact of precipitation manage- <br />ment, through which other environmental compart- <br />ments are affected, is on the extent and duration of <br />snow cover as it retreats in the spring. The snow cover <br />release date establishes the beginning of soil warming <br />and of the growing season for most vegetation and may <br />affect the duration of adequate moisture supply for <br />growth. From Forest Service studies, it appears that a <br />snowpack 150% of normal delays the disappearance of <br />snow cover at a given location by "-'5 days, leading to <br />an estimate of 1-3 days' delay resulting from precipita- <br />tion management. This estimate is probably too high <br />for windswept areas and too low for the much smaller <br />areas where snowdrifts accumulate. <br /> <br />2) AVALANCHE HAZARD <br /> <br />The relation between snowpack augmentation and <br />avalanche hazard is greatly complicated by other factor> <br />affecting the release of avalanches and affecting the <br />prediction, warning, and application of countermeasures <br />that mitigate this hazard. In chutes where they seldom <br />