<br />Bulletin American Meteorological Society
<br />
<br />velopment (or assigned to the hydroelectric compartment
<br />of multiple-use water projects) will tend to lend addi-
<br />tional justification to marginal hydroelectric projects,
<br />including pumped-storage projects where there is an
<br />opportunity to supplement the pumped supply with
<br />streamflow augmented by precipitation management. It
<br />does not appear likely, however, that precipitation man-
<br />agement will be more than a subsidiary factor in the
<br />economic considerations involved.
<br />
<br />3) MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY
<br />
<br />Substantially increased demands for water for this pur-
<br />pose are projected in certain areas of limited supply.
<br />It is unlikely that precipitation management will dis-
<br />place other responses such as water conservation and
<br />reuse. It is likely, however, that a mix of strategies will
<br />emerge that includes precipitation management in the
<br />role of a low-cost but limited capability alternative
<br />utilized to a limited extent.
<br />A principal component analysis of agricultural and
<br />economic characteristics of six counties arrayed across
<br />the precipitation gradient from Colorado to Illinois
<br />(Howell, 1976) showed strong precipitation-related dif-
<br />ferences among them. Cluster analysis showed that the
<br />wetter counties had a high proportion of land in har-
<br />vested crops, large investments in farm equipment, and
<br />a dense population, while dry counties had much idle
<br />(fallow) cropland and produced hay and cattle. Between
<br />the extremes, there was a set of counties characterized by
<br />a mixture of dry farming and irrigation, where fallow
<br />cropland and production of small grains were prominent.
<br />The analyses suggest that precipitation management
<br />would tend to shift these existing patterns of land use
<br />and related human activities slightly westward without
<br />much affecting the character of the patterns themselves.
<br />
<br />4) SUMMARY
<br />
<br />Human activities in the fields of agricultural, hydro-
<br />electric, and municipal-industrial use of water are likely
<br />to undergo adjustment to precipitation management
<br />through a mixed-strategy approach that will not place
<br />an inordinate degree of dependency on the continued
<br />ability of precipitation management to meet perform-
<br />ance targets.
<br />
<br />c. Impact on the natural environment-
<br />
<br />Summer convective
<br />
<br />Over most of the civilized world, the natural environ-
<br />ment is profoundly acculturated and bears few traits of
<br />wilderness. In considering the natural environment, one
<br />must, therefore, regard the environment as it is exempli-
<br />fied by the real landscape. Except for a few pockets of
<br />wilderness, the environment is the product of an on-
<br />going symbiosis between the land and humankind
<br />(Dubos, 1976). It is, nevertheless, useful to make the
<br />distinction between the direct, intentional impact of
<br />precipitation management on a cultural element such
<br />as agriculture and the complex of indirect effects that
<br />may impinge on other elements of the landscape and
<br />biosphere, be these "natural" or cultivated.
<br />
<br />493
<br />
<br />If precipitation management is applied to agricultural
<br />cropland in subhumid and semiarid regions, the largest
<br />receptor of indirect effects will be the surrounding and
<br />interspersed grasslands, scrublands, and breaks. The
<br />western Great Plains, from Montana to Wisconsin, from
<br />Colorado to Illinois, and from New Mexico to Missis-
<br />sippi, are remarkable in displaying an environmental
<br />continuum across a gradient of precipitation that in-
<br />creases '-'10% with each eastward displacement of
<br />60 km. This landscape is, therefore, a permanent exhibit
<br />of the potential eventual influence of widespread and
<br />prolonged precipitation management on the environ-
<br />ment.
<br />
<br />1) RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER
<br />
<br />The abiotic characteristics of the environment, such as
<br />runoff, groundwater, erosion, and soils, are greatly in-
<br />fluenced by physiography as well as precipitation. Run-
<br />off, which is intermittent at the dry end of the gradient,
<br />increases gradually with increasing summer-convective
<br />rainfall (in absolute quantity per unit area and as a
<br />proportion of the precipitation), and the coefficient of
<br />variation decreases. Groundwater recharge also tends to
<br />increase, but effects are overwhelmed by those of
<br />physiography and underlying geology.
<br />
<br />2) EROSION
<br />
<br />.Erosion has been found to be greatest ('-'28 g m-2 yr-1)
<br />where the rainfall is '-'270 mm yr-1 (Langbein and
<br />Schumm, 1958). In regions of lighter rainfall, the
<br />amount of erosion is dependent upon the amount of
<br />energy expended on the soil by falling rain and running
<br />water. Where the precipitation is greater, vegetation
<br />that tends to bind and protect the soil and susceptibility
<br />of particular soils to erosion are the dominant factors.
<br />About 83% of the variation in eroded soil has been at-
<br />tributed to vegetative cover in combination with litter,
<br />slope, and soil organic content (Meeuwig, 1970). In
<br />regimes of heavy rainfall, erosion is usually evident
<br />only where vegetation is disturbed. Since, under the
<br />assumptions previously stated, it is unlikely for economic
<br />and practical reasons that precipitation management
<br />will be applied in regions of <270 mm annual precipita-
<br />tion, its effect will be to decrease erosion except in
<br />regions of disturbance. Since agriculture represents by
<br />far the most widespread disturbance, the actual effect
<br />of precipitation management will be determined princi-
<br />pally by the efficacy of control measures practiced in
<br />connection with agricultural land use, and the effect
<br />of precipitation management will be quite secondary.
<br />
<br />3) SOIL TYPES
<br />
<br />These are recognized as the end product of accommoda.
<br />tion among geological, vegetational, animal, and climatic
<br />factors. Within the Great Plains, two or three diffuse
<br />boundaries between soil types may be found that are to
<br />some degree related to summer-convective rainfall
<br />amounts. Precipitation management would presumably
<br />cause an eventual slight shift in the position of these
<br />diffuse boundaries over a very long period of time.
<br />
|