Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bulletin American Meteorological Society <br /> <br />velopment (or assigned to the hydroelectric compartment <br />of multiple-use water projects) will tend to lend addi- <br />tional justification to marginal hydroelectric projects, <br />including pumped-storage projects where there is an <br />opportunity to supplement the pumped supply with <br />streamflow augmented by precipitation management. It <br />does not appear likely, however, that precipitation man- <br />agement will be more than a subsidiary factor in the <br />economic considerations involved. <br /> <br />3) MUNICIPAL AND INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY <br /> <br />Substantially increased demands for water for this pur- <br />pose are projected in certain areas of limited supply. <br />It is unlikely that precipitation management will dis- <br />place other responses such as water conservation and <br />reuse. It is likely, however, that a mix of strategies will <br />emerge that includes precipitation management in the <br />role of a low-cost but limited capability alternative <br />utilized to a limited extent. <br />A principal component analysis of agricultural and <br />economic characteristics of six counties arrayed across <br />the precipitation gradient from Colorado to Illinois <br />(Howell, 1976) showed strong precipitation-related dif- <br />ferences among them. Cluster analysis showed that the <br />wetter counties had a high proportion of land in har- <br />vested crops, large investments in farm equipment, and <br />a dense population, while dry counties had much idle <br />(fallow) cropland and produced hay and cattle. Between <br />the extremes, there was a set of counties characterized by <br />a mixture of dry farming and irrigation, where fallow <br />cropland and production of small grains were prominent. <br />The analyses suggest that precipitation management <br />would tend to shift these existing patterns of land use <br />and related human activities slightly westward without <br />much affecting the character of the patterns themselves. <br /> <br />4) SUMMARY <br /> <br />Human activities in the fields of agricultural, hydro- <br />electric, and municipal-industrial use of water are likely <br />to undergo adjustment to precipitation management <br />through a mixed-strategy approach that will not place <br />an inordinate degree of dependency on the continued <br />ability of precipitation management to meet perform- <br />ance targets. <br /> <br />c. Impact on the natural environment- <br /> <br />Summer convective <br /> <br />Over most of the civilized world, the natural environ- <br />ment is profoundly acculturated and bears few traits of <br />wilderness. In considering the natural environment, one <br />must, therefore, regard the environment as it is exempli- <br />fied by the real landscape. Except for a few pockets of <br />wilderness, the environment is the product of an on- <br />going symbiosis between the land and humankind <br />(Dubos, 1976). It is, nevertheless, useful to make the <br />distinction between the direct, intentional impact of <br />precipitation management on a cultural element such <br />as agriculture and the complex of indirect effects that <br />may impinge on other elements of the landscape and <br />biosphere, be these "natural" or cultivated. <br /> <br />493 <br /> <br />If precipitation management is applied to agricultural <br />cropland in subhumid and semiarid regions, the largest <br />receptor of indirect effects will be the surrounding and <br />interspersed grasslands, scrublands, and breaks. The <br />western Great Plains, from Montana to Wisconsin, from <br />Colorado to Illinois, and from New Mexico to Missis- <br />sippi, are remarkable in displaying an environmental <br />continuum across a gradient of precipitation that in- <br />creases '-'10% with each eastward displacement of <br />60 km. This landscape is, therefore, a permanent exhibit <br />of the potential eventual influence of widespread and <br />prolonged precipitation management on the environ- <br />ment. <br /> <br />1) RUNOFF AND GROUNDWATER <br /> <br />The abiotic characteristics of the environment, such as <br />runoff, groundwater, erosion, and soils, are greatly in- <br />fluenced by physiography as well as precipitation. Run- <br />off, which is intermittent at the dry end of the gradient, <br />increases gradually with increasing summer-convective <br />rainfall (in absolute quantity per unit area and as a <br />proportion of the precipitation), and the coefficient of <br />variation decreases. Groundwater recharge also tends to <br />increase, but effects are overwhelmed by those of <br />physiography and underlying geology. <br /> <br />2) EROSION <br /> <br />.Erosion has been found to be greatest ('-'28 g m-2 yr-1) <br />where the rainfall is '-'270 mm yr-1 (Langbein and <br />Schumm, 1958). In regions of lighter rainfall, the <br />amount of erosion is dependent upon the amount of <br />energy expended on the soil by falling rain and running <br />water. Where the precipitation is greater, vegetation <br />that tends to bind and protect the soil and susceptibility <br />of particular soils to erosion are the dominant factors. <br />About 83% of the variation in eroded soil has been at- <br />tributed to vegetative cover in combination with litter, <br />slope, and soil organic content (Meeuwig, 1970). In <br />regimes of heavy rainfall, erosion is usually evident <br />only where vegetation is disturbed. Since, under the <br />assumptions previously stated, it is unlikely for economic <br />and practical reasons that precipitation management <br />will be applied in regions of <270 mm annual precipita- <br />tion, its effect will be to decrease erosion except in <br />regions of disturbance. Since agriculture represents by <br />far the most widespread disturbance, the actual effect <br />of precipitation management will be determined princi- <br />pally by the efficacy of control measures practiced in <br />connection with agricultural land use, and the effect <br />of precipitation management will be quite secondary. <br /> <br />3) SOIL TYPES <br /> <br />These are recognized as the end product of accommoda. <br />tion among geological, vegetational, animal, and climatic <br />factors. Within the Great Plains, two or three diffuse <br />boundaries between soil types may be found that are to <br />some degree related to summer-convective rainfall <br />amounts. Precipitation management would presumably <br />cause an eventual slight shift in the position of these <br />diffuse boundaries over a very long period of time. <br />