Laserfiche WebLink
7. CWCB Report. <br />a. Set aside 20% of Severance Tax revenues for water storage projects. Jolul Redifer reported <br />that the CWCB will decide on adopting Policy Number 18 at its January 2008 meeting. <br />Policy 18 would permit the CWCB to set aside 20% of its revenues form the Severance Tax <br />Trust Fund Perpetual Base Account for water storage and rehabilitation projects. The funds <br />can be spent for feasibility study costs, engineering and surveying costs, land acquisition <br />costs, and project constn~ction costs. The CWCB would receive a share of the water rights <br />established by such projects and could then sell or lease the water in order to be returned its <br />investment in the project. <br />b. CBRT reconuilended limiting the scope of Policy 18. The CBRT reconullended limiting the <br />scope of Procedure b by deleting the following stn~ck through language: <br />b. A proposal to transfer a portion of the developed or unrestricted project water or project <br />benefits to the CWCB for the purposes of ~~*~~r° ~~'° ~~'°~~° ~ ~ ~~ ~' "~'~~~*r~~' <br />~~x~tt~a~use;-e~€e~ addressing compact calls, drought mitigation, endangered species, <br />instream flows, river restoration, recreation, ^r ^*'~°~ "~~~~^^°~ ~'°°~~°~' ^~~~^,,,-:^*°'~~ *'~° <br />~B. The sale or lease of water or benefits controlled by the CWCB shall be done in a <br />way so as to recover all or part of the State's investment in the project. The sale or lease of <br />water shall be limited to other beneficiaries of the project or to other entities, the permanent <br />transfer of which has been authorized by the Colorado General Assembly. <br />c. Two examples of how Policy 18 fiords could be spent. <br />Ovid Reservoir on South Platte: The proponent cannot afford to build the entire project, so <br />the CWCB could help participate. Tlus would benefit the state, which would receive more <br />water for fish and help the state meet its Compact obligations. The local agricultural district <br />would receive more water for agriculture. <br />Rio Grande reservoir enlargement: This would permit the Department of Wildlife to make <br />additional releases to improve the fishery, and help Colorado meet its Compact obligations. <br />d. CBRT member concerns that the State should not compete with the private sector. Tom <br />Clark, Kremmling Mayor, mentioned that the State should not compete with private <br />enterprise. Carlyle Currier mentioned that there is a potential conflict of interest for the <br />CWCB, since it could now act as both a bai~lcer by loaning funds from its Constriction Loan <br />Fund for projects and also serve as a part owner of projects if Policy 18 is adopted. Kim <br />Albertson recommended that the CWCB should limit its role to a lender. Louis Meyer <br />commented that the CWCB should limit purchases of water to maintaining instream flows, <br />and that it should not purchase instream flows for diversion out of the stream. <br />Eastern and Western Slope politics. Rick Brown of the CWCB mentioned that Policy 18 <br />could permit the CWCB to develop projects that would benefit the West Slope. Rachel <br />Richards, Pitkin County Commissioner, expressed concern that Policy 18 could permit the <br />CWCB to participate in projects that facilitate growth, and questioned who would decide that <br />the growth was good for the state. Greg Trainor of Mesa County mentioned that a grant of <br />funds by the CWCB toward a water project, as opposed to a loan, presumed that there should <br />be statewide benefit from the grant. Lurline Curran of Grand County mentioned that <br />Colorado legislative decisions tend to benefit the East Slope due to its greater population, and <br />I:AInterbasin Compact Coimnittee~Basin Roundtables\Colorado~Minutes~Ivlumtes Dec 2007 CBKT.doc 2 4~2, <br />