Laserfiche WebLink
<br />10 <br /> <br />PARK RANGE ATMOSPHERIC WATER RESOURCES PROGRAM <br /> <br /> 1964 1965 <br /> TASK NO\/. DEC. JAN. FEB. MAR. APR. MAY JUN JUL AUG. SEP. <br />A. EXPERIMENTAL <br /> DESIGN <br />B. TRAJECTORY AND <br /> SITING EXPERIMENTS <br />C. NATURAL DATA COL- <br /> LECTION a ANALYSIS <br />D. NUCLEI GENERATOR <br /> INSTALL a TEST <br />E. PHASE n <br /> OPERATIONAL PLAN rzz2 <br />F. FINAL REPORT --- -- -- --- ...-- --- ~--- <br /> <br />SCHEDULE <br /> <br />Figure S.-Park Range Program-Scheduled and Actual. <br /> <br />PERFORMANCE V/////////A <br /> <br />much longer period of tests without jeopardizing <br />our natural precipitation data. Manpower loading, <br />predicted and actual, is shown in figure 9. Logistic <br />support was to come almost entirely from Denver <br />by bus and train. <br />In summary, the program as planned differed <br />from that as performed in these major respects: <br /> <br />the use of zinc sulphide for diffusion work, <br /> <br />the development of particle detection devices for both <br />ZnS and AgI that make ground tracing much easier than <br />we anticipated, <br /> <br />the expansion of the measurement network to give much <br />better coverage on the Park Range ridge than we origi- <br />naIl y though t practical, <br /> <br />the choice of the optical snow-rate sensor, and <br /> <br />the use of on-site analog recording for precipitation-rate <br />rather than central collection in digitized form. <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />...J <br />'" <br />z <br />z <br />o <br />'" <br />0: <br />'" <br />Q. 10 <br />... <br />o <br />0: <br />'" <br />III <br />'" <br />::> <br />z <br /> <br />PHASE I <br />PREDICTED <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />NOV. DEC, JAN, FEB, MAR, APR, MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP. <br />MONTH <br /> <br />Figure 9.-Program Manpower Loading-Proposed and Actual. <br />