My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00444
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:19 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:02:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Evaluation of Idaho's 1992-1993 Winter Cloud Seeding Program
Date
10/1/1993
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 . EVALUATION OF THE NORTHERN PORTION OF THE UPPER SNAKE <br /> <br />Target Area <br /> <br />The upper Snake project actually had two target areas. One is immediately north and east <br />of the Bear target area, or just downwind from the Bear target for many storms. The other <br />upper Snake target is the region of Idaho immediately west of Yellowstone Park and <br />bordering Montana. The latter area, to be referred to as the "northem upper Snake" target, <br />will be considered first. Both regions and the Bear target area are shown on figure 8. The <br />target areas specified in the NAWe reports are shown. Unlike the boundary around the <br />drainage area of interest shown on figure 2, these target areas appear to coincide with about <br />the 6500-foot elevation contour. Silver iodide generator locations from NA we maps, and <br />available ses snow measurements sites above 6000 feet, are also shown on figure 8. <br /> <br />Some of the northem upper Snake target and/or control sites could be contaminated by <br />seeding in the Boise project, the rest of the upper Snake project, and in the Bear project for <br />some wind directions. However, AgI concentrations would be quite diluted that far <br />downwind, which would minimize any impact. Several snow measurement sites exist within <br />50 miles east of the Boi.se target which were not chosen for control sites because of concems <br />about seeding affecting them. <br /> <br />7.1 Control Sites <br /> <br />Table 2 lists the target and control snowpack measurement sites used in evaluation of the <br />upper Snake along the Idaho-Montana border. One of the target sites (No. 60) is just <br />downwind from the target, on the Montana side of the barrier crest. However, the site was <br />included because it was judged more likely to be affected by seeding than the lower elevation <br />sites in Idaho. <br /> <br />As in the Boise target analysis, all available target sites and all available upwind controls <br />sites within reasonable distance were used so long as the measurement sites had good April <br />1 SWE records since 1963 or earlier, were above 6000 feet elevation, and were judged <br />unlikely to have serious contamination froni upwind seeding. No attempt was made at this <br />stage to pick a particular set of target or control sites which might make seeding appear <br />either more or less effective than based on analysis of all available sites in a stated category. <br /> <br />The 14 control sites chosen range from west to northwest of the northern upper Snake target, <br />with several control sites in Montana. Two control sites (Darkhorse Lake and Lemhi Ridge) <br />have co-located snow courses and snow pillows. Both types of measurement were used. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.