Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />20 <br /> <br />30 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />50 <br />50 <br /> <br />50 <br /> <br /> <br />~ 40 <br />...c 40 <br />() <br />c <br />.- <br />............ <br />w <br />3: 30 30 <br />(f) <br />-+- <br />Q) <br />rn <br />L 20 <br />o 20 <br />l- <br />e <br />0 <br />Q) <br />2 10 10 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />10 <br />Mean <br /> <br />20 <br />Control <br /> <br />30 <br />SWE <br /> <br />40 <br />(inch) <br /> <br />o <br />50 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />Figure 7. - Similar to figure 3 except average April 1 SWE from four sites downwind of the Boise target versus the <br />average of six upwind control sites. <br /> <br />In conclusion, target-control analysis of the Boise target area was performed using SCS snow <br />course and snow pillow observations. The 1993 winter had somewhat more snowfall in the <br />target than predicted by the 30 prior nonseeded winters. However, the departures were <br />within the range of natural variability. Insufficient information exists to conclude whether <br />the 1993 winter's seeding had any effect on the target area snowfall. <br /> <br />18 <br />