My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00439
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00439
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:16 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
HIPLEX-1: Experimental Design and Response Variables
Date
4/4/1984
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />APRIL 1984 <br /> <br />SMITH ET AL. <br /> <br />505 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />."",.....-----~ <br />,," J <br />,,/ / <br /> <br />,/ ~1, <br />\ ~ <br />\ <br />.... <br />-- <br />-- I __ <br />I, ---'!--,ooc~ <br />" I <br />I, r-{ <br />"-BoC : ~ <br />~I, I <br />~Il 1 <br />"I I <br />I, I <br />I, I <br />Iii <br />" <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />o~ <br /> <br />FiG. 3. Illustration of the first post-treatment pass ("2-min pass") <br />by the cloud physics aircraft. After the treatment pass by the seeding <br />aircraft, the cloud physics aircraft penetrated the cloud at about the <br />-goc level in an orthogonal direction that would intersect the curtain <br />of ice crystals produced by the dry ice pellets. Meanwhile the seeding <br />aircraft continued to monitor the development of the cloud top: <br /> <br />for the various measurements, because several of the <br />response variables are expressed in terms of times since <br />treatment. <br />Close coordination of the multiple aircraft and radar <br />operations was needed in order to collect compatible <br />data on the same cloud for the case duration of ap- <br />proximately 45 min. The navigation systems on the <br />aircraft made it possible to repeatedly sample the de- <br />sired portion of the selected cloud, even as it drifted <br />with the environmental winds. Thus it was possible in <br />most cases to follow the development of the seeded <br />plume within a cloud over times exceeding 15 min. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />b. Execution of the procedures <br /> <br />The experimental procedure worked fairly well in <br />practice. Table 4 presents the values of the "selection <br />variables" determined for each HIPLEX-I test case <br />cloud. More than half of the clouds had average liquid <br />- water concentrations (A WCO) under I g m-3, indicating <br />that the overall sample comprised relatively dry clouds. <br />Within Class A-I, all three of the nonseeded cases had <br />AWCO> I g m-3, while two of the four seeded cases <br />had A WCO < I g m-3. On the other hand, the A-I' <br />seeded cases generally had stronger updrafts and greater <br />buoyancy than the nonseeded cases. The distributions <br />of values among the larger sample of Class B clouds <br />are better balanced in these respects. <br />The measured initial ice particle concentrations <br />(AICO) were all 0.1 L -lor less, except for Case 7. That <br />case had negative buoyancy, and the ice-particle con- <br />centrations decreased on subsequent penetrations <br /> <br /> <br />.._._.t..._... J.. <br /> <br />,L.' <br /> <br />around the-80C level (cf. Table 6); The vertical air <br />motions (VVLO) ranged from slight downdrafts to an <br />updraft of just over 10 m S-I, with the median being <br />a 4 m S-I updraft. The cloud widths (LPNO) ranged <br />from just over 2 km to a maximum of 7.9 km, with <br />a median of about 3.2 km.. The median A-I cloud <br />width was 2.8 km, compared to a Class B median of <br />3.4 km; such a difference is consistent with the overall <br />selection criteria for the two classes. The Class B seeded <br />clouds were generally broader than the nonseeded <br />clouds, and had somewhat colder cloud bases. The <br />overall cloud base temperature (CBTO) ranged from <br />+ 1.5 to + II oC, with a median of +60C. <br />An error was made in the selection of Test Case <br />No. 16 (16 June 1980), and it should not have entered <br />the HIPLEX-I experiment. The error arose from the <br />measurement of vertical air motion. The system nor- <br />mally used for real-time determination of the vertical <br />wind was based on a vertically-stabilized accelerometer; <br />during the 16 June flight, the circuit breaker controlling <br />power to that accelerometer was open. This caused <br />the calculated vertical wind to have a large positive <br />value, and the cloud passed the real-time selection <br />criteria for Class A-I. However, when the data were <br />reprocessed using a technique that does not depend <br />on the accelerometer, the resulting updraft at the target <br />point was found to be -4.2 m S-I, a value low enough <br />to have disqualified the cloud. <br />Throughout HIPLEX-I, the real-time measurements <br />of vertical wind were based on the technique described <br />by Cooper (1978a), while subsequent data processing <br />was based on the improved scheme described by Rodi <br /> <br /> <br />FIG. 4. The cloud physics aircraft made passes through the cloud <br />at the -80C level at about 2 and 5 min after treatment, along re- <br />ciprocal tracks. It then descended to the - 5 oC level for a series of <br />passes at about 8, II, 14, and 17 min after treatment. All these <br />passes were made along tracks orthogonal to the expected ice crystal <br />curtain. The seeding aircraft remained at cloud top until about 10 <br />min after treatment. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.