My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00430
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:07 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:00:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Diagnostic Technique for Targeting During Airborne Seeding Experiments in Wintertime Storms over the Sierra Nevada
Date
7/7/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />also made along the seedline prior to seeding. The <br />MOCA in the Sierra region is approximately 300 m <br />above the terrain. The radiometric and aircraft mea- <br />surements were both considered when estimating the <br />average cloud liquid water content. The value ofliquid <br />water content used in the targeting calculations was <br />chosen subjectively based on the values measured by <br />the radiometer and aircraft, and on the upward or <br />downward trend of the radiometric measurements. <br />Operationally, the goal was to reasonably anticipate <br />the cloud liquid water content during the seeding ex- <br />periment. The liquid water content assigned as an input <br />variable in the targeting calculation was assumed to <br />characterize the entire cloud system along the particle <br />trajectories. <br />Several studies have considered the riming process <br />with particular application to the Sierra Range (Reink- <br />ing 1974,1979; Rodi et al. 1985; Prasad 1986). Reink- <br />ing's data provide information concerning the mini- <br />mum crystal size necessary for onset of riming, but <br />provide no information concerning the effect of vari- <br />ations in average liquid water content of the cloud. <br />Rodi et al. (1985) and Prasad (1986) used a micro- <br />physical model developed by Heymsfield (1982) and <br />Heymsfield and Pflaum (1985) to estimate the onset <br />of riming in Sierra fixed-target type cloud systems. <br />Their studies specified the time of onset of riming as <br />a function of liquid water content and cloud temper- <br />ature. Figure 4 shows the onset time of riming as a <br />function ofliquid water content for three temperatures <br />specified by Rodi et al. (1985). The lines are visual fits <br />to these data points for extrapolation to other liquid <br />water contents. In the parameterization used in SCPP, <br />these curves were assumed to apply for dendritic habits <br />(-I50C, squares), plates (-12 oC, triangles), and col- <br />umns or needles (-80C, circles). This parameterization <br />allowed an estimate of the time of riming onset on the <br />basis of two measurable parameters, cloud liquid water <br />content and temperature. <br />Once the onset of riming occurred, the particle was <br />assumed to encounter supercooled water throughout <br />the remainder of its trajectory. A uniform distribution <br />ofliquid along the trajectory was assumed. The rate at <br />which a particle becomes rimed is a function of liquid <br />water content. The time after onset of riming that a <br />particle became heavily rimed was assumed to be a <br />function of the cloud liquid water content. The param- <br />eterization used is shown on Fig. 4. The rate of con- <br />version was relatively slow (40 min) at minimal liquid <br />water content (<0.10 g m -3), but proceeded quickly at <br />high liquid water content (0.30-0.50 g m-3). Typically, <br />in fixed target experiments, the measured liquid water <br />content was 0.05-0.20 g m-3. Based on past data col- <br />lected on the frequency of supercooled water, target <br />crystals in most fixed-target conditions would become <br />heavily rimed within 15-25 min after onset, although <br />in very wet conditions, heavy riming could occur in as <br />short as 2 min (see section 4). <br /> <br />816 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />Column or Needle <br />.6 .J <br /> <br />- <br />~ <br />I <br />E .5 <br />01 <br /> <br /> <br /> -8e Rodi et <br />- .4 -12 A a!. (1985) <br />c <br />CI) -15. <br />- <br />c <br />0 .3 <br />u <br />... <br />CI) <br />- <br />0 .2 <br />:= <br />"0 <br />::I .I <br />2' <br />....J <br /> .0 <br /> 0 10 20 30 40 50 <br /> Time after Release (min) <br /> (a ) <br /> <br />.6 <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />~ <br />IE .5 <br />01 <br /> <br />_ .4 <br />c <br />CI) <br />- <br />c <br />8 .3 <br />... <br />CI) <br />~ .2 <br />"0 <br />g. .I <br />....J <br /> <br />.0 <br />o 10 20 30 40 <br />Time after onset of Riming <br /> <br />50 <br />(min) <br /> <br />( b) <br /> <br />FIG. 4. (a) Onset time of riming as a function ofIiquid water content. <br />(b) Time after riming onset that an ice particle is assumed to be <br />heavily rimed. <br /> <br />3) PARTICLE FALL VELOCITIES <br /> <br />Fall velocities of ice particles are a strong function <br />of particle shape, mass and degree of rime. Studies of <br />particle fall velocity can be broadly divided into two <br />types: I) theoretical studies using relationships between <br />the Best and Reynolds numbers (Cornford 1965; List <br />and Schemenauer 1971; Kajikawa 1971); and 2) direct <br />measurements of ice particle fall velocities using stro- <br />boscopic methods (Brown 1970; Davis 1974; Locatelli <br />and Hobbs 1974). Our approach was to use the direct <br />measurements of Brown (1970), Davis (1974), and Lo- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.