Laserfiche WebLink
<br />JULY 1988 <br /> <br />RAUBER ET AL. <br /> <br />823 <br /> <br />computed for each of the fixed target experiments of <br />1985-86 by integrating the errors along the entire par- <br />ticle trajectories. The error in the center of the fallout <br />area due to errors in the wind fields was almost always <br />within 10 km of the Kingvale site and often within 5 <br />km. This shift generally, but not always, left Kingvale <br />within the expected area of effect. <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />b. Ice particle growth rates <br /> <br />Ice particle growth rates used in targeting were based <br />on the laboratory measurements of Ryan et al. (1976) <br />and Fukuta and Wang (1984). These experiments were <br />conducted under water saturated conditions. In the <br />Ryan et al. experiments, water saturation was main- <br />tained by growing crystals in an environment with liq- <br />uid water contents near 3 g m-3. These diffusional <br />growth rates therefore represent maximums expected <br />in real atmospheric conditions. <br />During SCPP, ice particles created by seeding have <br />been observed in a number of experiments (e.g., Stewart <br />and Marwitz 1982b; Martner 1986; Deshler and Reyn- <br />olds 1987). Natural conditions in the vicinity of seeded <br />regions have varied substantially. This natural vari- <br />ability has had a substantial effect on the identification <br />of seeding effects. Martner (1986) found that only 25% <br />of the seedlines penetrated by aircraft showed unam- <br />biguous seeding effects. In the remaining 75%, seeding <br />effects did not appear either because highly variable <br />and large ice particle concentrations already existed <br />naturally or large droplets masked the signal on the <br />optical array probes (Rauber and Heggli 1988). <br />When seeding effects were observed in the orographic <br />cloud systems, somewhat consistent information <br />emerged. With few important exceptions, particle <br />growth rates were found to be consistent over a broad <br />temperature range. Figure 9 shows a plot of observed <br /> <br />!~ <br /> <br />1.6 <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />'T", <br />~ 1.2 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />(f) <br />UJ <br />~ <br />a: <br />I 0.8 <br />I- <br />~ <br />o <br />a: <br />Cl <br />~ 0.4 <br />u <br />j:: <br />a: <br />~ <br /> <br />-4 -5 -6 -7 -8 -9 -10 -II -12 -13 -14 <br />TEMPERATURE (Oe) <br /> <br />FIG. 9. (Solid lines) Variation of crystal axial growth rates with <br />temperature from Ryan et al. (1976) experiments. (Line segments) <br />estimated crystal growth rates based on optical array probe images <br />collected during seedline penetrations (see text). Coincident line seg- <br />ments are indicated by different symbols. <br /> <br />particle growth rates in seeded regions derived from <br />cloud physics aircraft data collected at various tem- <br />perature levels. The particle growth rates were deter- <br />mined by measuring sizes of particles associated with <br />seeding from optical array probe images at the time of <br />seedline penetration and dividing these values by the <br />time elapsed between the release of the seeding material <br />and the observation. Particles associated with seeding <br />were identified by comparing particle spectra measured <br />during the seedline penetration with those directly out- <br />side the region of seeding effects. These data are also <br />tabulated in Table 3. The table also describes ambient <br />cloud conditions and other pertinent information as- <br />sociated with each observation. The diffusional growth <br />rate curves of Ryan et al. (1976) are also shown in <br />Fig. 9. <br />Although scatter exists in the observations, the ob- <br />served growth rates in the seeded regions of clouds gen- <br />erally fell below the rates measured in the laboratory. <br />With one exception, no enhanced growth was observed <br />along the c-axis between -4.50 and -7.50e. The ex- <br />ception occurred during one seedline penetration on <br />5 Febmary 1983 where needlelike habits were observed. <br />In all other cases, small thick columns, hexagonal <br />plates, or small irregular particles were observed. These <br />habits are characteristic of sub-water saturated con- <br />ditions. The high ice particle concentrations, reductions <br />in supercooled water observed in plume penetrations, <br />and consistent particle habits and slow growth rates all <br />suggest that sub-water saturated conditions existed lo- <br />cally in plumes due to overseeding. It is interesting to <br />note that supercooled liquid was observed on the seed- <br />line during the case when larger needles were observed. <br />In the temperature range < -80C, growth rates and <br />habits more closely matched the laboratory measure- <br />ments. It is important to point out that the seeding <br />agent in several cases was Agl. Small particles were <br />observed on the seedline through 40 and 81 min, re- <br />spectively, on 18 and 22 December 1986. These small <br />particles may indicate slow growth rates, but, more <br />likely were due to continued nucleation well downwind <br />of the release point. <br />According to Heymsfield (1987), preferred mecha- <br />nisms of growth occur after initial diffusional growth <br />depending on the habit of the particle. He found that <br />particles with small cross-sectional area grow by accre- <br />tion much more efficiently than by aggregation. In <br />contrast, particles with large cross-sectional areas, such <br />as needles growing at -60C, or dendrites growing at <br />-I50C, grow efficiently by aggregation. Direct obser- <br />vations within seeded plumes suggested that the pri- <br />mary growth mechanism in shallow orographic cloud <br />systems seeded in SCPP during the later period of crys- <br />tal growth was accretion. Aggregation was rarely ob- <br />served. Heymsfield's results indicate that for liquid wa- <br />ter contents normally present in these cloud types <br />(0.05-0.20 g m-3), maximum dimensions reached be- <br />fore impact would be 500-800 ILm and terminal ve- <br />