Laserfiche WebLink
<br />II <br />II <br />II <br />II <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />3.0 SUMMARY OF SEEDING MISSIONS <br /> <br />3.1 Project Design <br />The 1978 project was designed to provide operational <br />seeding and at the same time allocate a portion of the seeding effort <br />for experimentation. All parties concerned agreed that steps should <br />be taken to collect data that would enhance the evaluation process. <br />Thus aircraft data and radar measurements were employed a.s well <br />as a network of rain gauges. The University of Delaware was <br />assigned the responsibilities to collect and analyze the raingage <br />network data. CIC collected and analyzed the radar /aircraft data. <br />To further facilitate the evaluation process an experi- <br />mental period was defined in which part of the potentially seedable <br />days would not be seeded and used as controls. These control days <br />were selected from a random distribution generated to give a split <br />of one-third no-seed/two-thirds seed. The University of Delaware <br />directed the randomization procedures and provided personnel at the <br />operations site to control the loading of the pyroteclmic devices. On <br />the no-seed days, placebo flares were loaded by the University per- <br />sonnel. The CIC personnel had no knowledge of which days were <br />selected for control. Thus the CIC operating procedures were" iden- <br />tical for all operating days. In fact this information was withheld <br />from CIC until the analyses were completed, thus preventing bias in <br />the operations and analysis procedures. <br />Due to the desire to obtain as much operational cover- <br />age as possible, the hours outside the Experimental Period were <br />declared operational (with a few exceptions). <br /> <br />23 <br /> <br />'. <br />