Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Canal designers usually specify the use <br />of some kind of lining to reduce seepage <br />and the resultant water loss. Lining materi- <br />als typically consist of compacted clay, <br />concrete, or geomembranes (plastic liners). <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />reduce irrigation water shortages, and bene- <br />fit recreation, fish, and wildlife. <br />Reclamation serves as the technical lead <br />in a cooperative program to develop low- <br />cost, durable canal linings suitable for <br /> <br />Alternative Canal <br />Linings - Deschutes <br />Demonstration <br />Project <br /> <br />JAY SWIHART <br />Materials Engineering Branch <br /> <br />Older canals are often unlined, and can <br />have high seepage rates depending on the <br />permeability of the native soil. The north- <br />western United States has extremely <br />permeable soil and severe (angular) geo- <br />logic conditions, including highly fractured <br />basalt, loose pumice stone, and other <br />porous materials. These angular subgrades <br />often cause damage to geomembrane liners <br />that are susceptible to sharp objects. <br />A 1972 Reclamation report estimated <br />that unlined irrigation canals in the upper <br />Deschutes River basin, Oregon, lose about <br />500,000 acre-feet of water per year <br />through seepage. To put that loss in per- <br />spective, the average household uses <br />between If2 and 1 acre foot of water per <br />year. In some canal reaches, seepage <br />causes up to 50 percent of the irrigation <br />water loss. Recent ponding tests found av- <br />erage seepage rates on sections of the <br />Arnold and the North Unit canals of the <br />Deschutes Project ranging from 0.64 to <br />4.20 ft3fft2fday. These rates represent <br />increases of one to two orders ofmagni- <br />tude over the average seepage rate of <br />0.07 ft3fft2fday for a well-built, concrete- <br />lined canal. Water saved through lining <br />can enhance and stabilize river flows, <br /> <br />installation over severe subgrade condi- <br />tions. Collaborators include Reclamation's <br />Denver Office and Pacific Northwest <br />Region, Arnold Irrigation District, North <br />Unit Irrigation District, Oregon Water <br />Resources Department, and about a dozen <br />material suppliers and installation contrac- <br />tors. Other Reclamation Regional Offices <br />and irrigation districts are expected to join <br />in the effort beginning in Fiscal Year 1994. <br />Material suppliers and installation con- <br />tractors were encouraged to provide new <br />materials and installation techniques that <br />could accommodate severe subgrades, <br />form a watertight membrane, resist weath- <br />ering, provide slope stability, <br />accommodate subgrade movement, and <br />resist animal damage and vandalism. <br />Effectiveness of the canal linings will be <br />determined by comparing the seepage data <br />from the ponding tests performed both <br />before and after installation. Durability <br />will be assessed from future (years 5 and <br />10) ponding tests, annual O&M reports, <br />visual inspections, and periodic coupon <br />testing. Initial construction costs, O&M <br />costs, seepage costs, and durability (life <br />expectancy) will determine life-cycle costs. <br />