Laserfiche WebLink
<br />one-third of the area. Extensive outdoor recreation use is made of both <br />public and private lands. <br /> <br />Historically, the Basin has been sparsely populated. However, the popu- <br />lation began to increase significantly about 1965. Since the 1980 census, <br />the increases have been attributed to the so-called Sun Belt phenomena. <br />However, the most dramatic local population growth patterns are related to <br />expanding energy development industries. Service industries to serve the <br />energy and recreation communities also account for a significant portion of <br />the population growth. <br /> <br />B. The No Action Alternative <br /> <br />The no action alternative presents no impacts due to changes in the <br />precipitation regime, runoff, streamflow, or water yield in the Basin. <br />The negative effects due to failure to augment the Basin's water supplies <br />by cloud seeding mayor may not be offset by other augmentation methods. <br /> <br />C. The Cloud Seeding Alternative <br /> <br />The environmental effects of increasing precipitation by seeding clouds <br />over a short term (research mode) and over the long term (operational <br />mode) have been discussed in National Environmental POlici Act compliance <br />documents. Short-term environmental effects have been discu.ssed in the <br />Colorado River Basin Pilot Project Final Environmental Statement [7J, <br />the Project Skywater Programmatic Final Environmental Statement [2J, <br />and the Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project Environmental Assessment [8J. <br />Potential effects of widespread and prolonged application of precipita- <br />tion management wwere considered at the Skywater IX Conference [9J, and <br />received preliminary evaluation in the Project Skywater Final Environmental <br />Statement [2J. The studies of the effects of precipitation increases on <br />ecological sectors in the San Juan Mountains were an important part of the <br />Colorado River Basin Pilot Project. The results of these studies are found <br />in the San Juan Ecology Report [10J. <br /> <br />Cloud seeding research activities in the Rocky Mountains, the Sierra <br />Nevada, the Medicine Bow Mountains, and the Cascades have been accom- <br />plished without adverse environmental consequences. In addition, many <br />Western States have supported opey'ational cloud seeding programs or have <br />issued permits for private sector programs. Certain environmental issues <br />have been related to winter orographic cloud seeding as a result of <br />these research and operational experiences. Some of these issues have <br />been laid to rest by the scientific community. Others will require con- <br />tinued data collection and monitoring in order to judge their importance <br />and impact. <br /> <br />An array of historical studies have been concluded that incremental <br />increases in precipitation over the short terms of research mode cloud <br />seeding programs do not have significant adverse effects on various <br />environmental-ecological sectors. The primary reason cited for this <br />conclusion is the fact that the incremental increases are well within <br />historic annual variations in precipitation in the study areas. As addi- <br />tional information and experience has become available, estimates of <br /> <br />9 <br />