My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00420
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00420
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:38:57 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 9:59:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Corrections of Surface Particle Probe Measurements for the Effects of Aspiration
Date
8/4/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />AUGUST 1988 <br /> <br />TERR Y DESHLER <br /> <br />549 <br /> <br /> TABLE 1. Comparison of simultaneous sampling of snowfall by an airborne and aspirated 2D-C. <br /> Sample <br /> 2 3 4 All samples <br />Winds (m S-I) 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.9 3.0 <br />Concentration (L -I) <br />aspirated <br />aircraft 32 18 15 22 22 <br /> 9.0 7.2 5.4 5.3 6.7 <br />}. (mm-I) <br />aspirated <br />aircraft 7.1 7.6 7.4 8.8 7.7 <br /> 3.5 3.8 3.1 3.3 3.4 <br />Ratio of IPC (aspirated:aircraft) 3.6 2.5 2.8 4.2 3.3 <br />Size interval (mm) Ratios of IPC by size bin (aspirated:aircraft) <br /> 0.05-0.1 5.2 5.1 8.4 6.2 6.2 <br /> 0.1-0.2 4.4 3.0 3.4 5.2 4.0 <br /> 0.2-0.3 2.9 1.8 2.7 6.2 3.4 <br /> 0.3-0.4 4.3 1.8 1.6 3.2 2.7 <br /> 0.4-0.5 2.5 1.3 1.9 <br /> 0.5-0.6 1.4 1.2 0.7 1.1 <br /> 0.6-0.8 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.4 <br /> <br />slightly different calibration constants compared to the <br />one used by Holroyd. Software changes were made to <br />account for the new windspeed sensor. After collection, <br />data from the aspirated and truck-mounted 2D-C were <br />processed using the same software. This software was, <br />in most respects, similar to that described by Holroyd <br />(1987) and used by Holroyd (1986). Sample volume <br />corrections supplied by PMS for small sizes were not <br />used. <br /> <br />3. Experiments and results <br /> <br />a. Comparison of airborne and aspirated 2D-C <br /> <br />The aircraft and ground measurements were made <br />at 1630 LST 12 December 1985, at the airport near <br />Laramie, Wyoming. A fast moving short wave crossing <br />southeastern Wyoming produced a snow shower across <br />the valley that afternoon. Cloud base was 300 m above <br />ground, the surface temperature was -120C and winds <br />were from the north at 4 m S-I in light snow. The <br />aircraft made four passes at 10 to 20 m overhead, lasting <br />20 to 30 sec each, while the aspirated 2D-C was op- <br />erated at the ground. Observations of snow crystal habit <br />were not made at the time of the experiments. An anal- <br />ysis of 2D-C images indicates that the snowfall was <br />composed of moderate to heavily rimed planar crystals. <br />Aggregation was not occurring. <br />For comparison, the ground data were averaged for <br />time intervals selected so that sample volumes matched <br />those from the aircraft passes. Time intervals from 45 <br />to 110 sec were required. For each pass a concentration <br />and size distribution was calculated from the two in- <br />struments. An exponential function of the form N <br /> <br />1011 <br /> <br /> <br />.. <br />'E <br /> <br />z <br />o <br /> <br />~107 <br />0: <br />I- <br />Z <br />W <br />U <br />Z <br />o <br />u <br /> <br />., <br />1 <br />I GROUND BASED <br />I <br />lr, <br />Ll <br />1 <br />L,,-.., <br />II AIRBORNE <br /> <br />L~- <br /> <br />106 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />DIAMETER (mm) <br /> <br />FiG. I. Size distributions of snowfall from simultaneous measurements <br />by an airborne and aspirated 2D-C. <br /> <br />= Noe-w was used to fit the size distributions where N <br />is particle concentration and D particle diameter. Val- <br />ues of IPC and ^ from the two instruments are shown <br />in Table 1. Also shown are ratios ofIPC in each size <br />bin for the aspirated and aircraft data. Ratios are pre- <br />sented only for size bins where more than 10 particles <br />were sampled by each probe. A typical size distribution <br />from the two instruments for these passes is shown in <br />Fig. 1. The results of these comparisons indicate that <br />the aspirated instrument measures consistently high <br />by approximately a factor of 3 in total concentration. <br /> <br />"'4;."_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.