Laserfiche WebLink
<br />548 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC TECHNOLOGY, <br /> <br />VOLUME 5 <br /> <br />(1985) performed numerical studies modeling water <br />droplet trajectories within the aspirator flow field, while <br />Holroyd (1986) made comparisons in snowfall with a <br />2D-C probe operated with and without aspiration. <br />Norment's calculations indicated that errors, intro- <br />duced by aspiration into the measurement of particle <br />concentrations, are a function of particle size. Holroyd's <br />measurements showed that the instrument overesti- <br />mates IPC, but found the error to be the same at all <br />ice particle sizes sampled. The purpose of this paper is <br />to provide a more complete empirical calibration of <br />this instrument by presenting simultaneous measure- <br />ments with an aspirated 2D-C and three other methods <br />to measure IPC at the surface. For comparison, IPC <br />measurements were collected with an airborne 2D-C <br />on a low-flying aircraft, oil-coated slides exposed to an <br />airstream, and a 2D-C carried on the front bumper of <br />a truck. <br /> <br />2. Observational equipment <br /> <br />The aspirated 2D-C used in all of the experiments <br />has been described by Humphries (1985). The size res- <br />olution of the probe is 25 ~m and the range is 800 ~m. <br />The probe is always held vertically. The aspirator pro- <br />vides a constant 13.5 m S-I airspeed at the sampling <br />section; however, particles only reach a fraction of this <br />speed before they are sampled. The clock rate of the <br />2D-C was set for a particle speed of 8 m S-I since this <br />was found to produce spherical images of 100-300 ~m <br />water droplets sprayed into the aspirator, and was also <br />found to produce reasonable snow particle images. <br />Holroyd (1986), using the "square image" option of <br />an aspirated PMS gray-scale 2D-C probe, also deter- <br />mined that the speed of snow particles through the <br />sample area was about 8 m S-I. The sample volume <br />with an aspirator is a constant 0.66 L S-l, determined <br />by the 13.5 m S-I airspeed, and is independent of the <br />clock rate of the 2D-C. To obtain IPC at the surface, <br />the other techniques used were measurements by an <br />airborne 2D-C flown 10 to 20 m above ground, ice <br />crystals collected on oil-coated slides exposed to an <br />airstream and counted, and measurements from a 2D- <br />C carried on a truck. Measurements from the airborne <br />and truck-mounted probe also provided size distribu- <br />tions, whereas oil-coated slides were used to provide <br />only concentration. <br />Comparisons with the airborne 2D-C were done us- <br />ing the University of Wyoming's King Air, which has <br />been described by Cooper et al. (1984). The 2D-C on <br />the aircraft was similar to the probe used on the ground. <br />Image data from the airborne and ground 2D-C were <br />analyzed with the same software to eliminate differ- <br />ences that could result from different processing al- <br />gorithms (Walsh 1984). Processing eliminates spurious <br />particles, counts and sizes acceptable particles, and <br />calculates sample volume. For these data, software from <br />the University of Wyoming was used. Sample volume <br />corrections for small sizes were not used. <br /> <br />Collecting ice crystals on oil-coated slides to measure <br />IPC has been done by Cooper and Saunders (1980) on <br />aircraft, and by Vali et al. (1981) in a wind tunnel. For <br />the experiments presented here, microscope slides were <br />coated with mineral oil, fixed on the' end of a metal <br />rod, and spun for 2 to 16 revolutions by an electric <br />motor. The number of revolutions was selected based <br />on estimated snowfall rate. After exposure, random <br />photographs of the slides were taken under a micro- <br />scope. Particles on the slides were then counted from <br />photographs. The device used to expose the slides was <br />built by the University of Wyoming. The glass slides <br />were 12 X 55 mm and the radius of rotation 611 mm. <br />The speed of the slides averaged 8.8 m S-I. <br />Collection efficiencies for the slides were calculated <br />using Ranz and Wong (1952). At 8,8 m S-I the collec- <br />tion efficiency for a 12 mm ribbon is 0.3,0.5, and 0.9 <br />for particles with diameters of25, 50, and 100 ~m. For <br />the purpose of this study, the collection efficiency was <br />assumed to be 1.0 for particles greater than 100 ~m <br />and 0.5 for particles less than 100 ~m. Only a few par- <br />ticles less than 100 ~m were found. <br />The, IPC were calculated from each slide using <br /> <br />IPC = N;/(A27TLR), <br /> <br />where Ni is the number of ice crystals counted (adjusted <br />for collection efficiency), A the area photographed, L <br />the length of the rod, and 1? the number of revolutions. <br />For comparison, time intervals of 20 sec were used to <br />obtain concentrations from the 2D-C. This typically <br />resulted in sample volumes on the 2D-C of 0.5 to 3 <br />times that of the oil-coated slides. Although it is best <br />to compare sample volumes of similar size, the 'pro- <br />cessing used for the 2D-C data limited the minimum <br />sampling interval to 10 s. Thus sample volumes from <br />the 2D-C were broken into discrete lOs, 6.6 L samples; <br />whereas sample volumes from the oil-slide data varied <br />continuously depending on the area photographed and <br />the number of revolutions. To simplifY data processing, <br />20 sec was chosen as the sampling interval for the 2D- <br />C data. This was a compromise between the extremes <br />of the oil-slide data and insured that the 2D-C mea- <br />surements coincided closely in time with the oil-slide <br />data. Approximately half of the oil slides had sample <br />volumes within 50% of the 13.2 L used for the 2D-C <br />data. A comparison was made between 6.6 and 13.2 <br />L sample volumes for the 2D-C data and there were <br />no significant differences. <br />The truck-mounted system was used by Holroyd <br />(1986) who described the probe, including the truck <br />mount. The probe was mounted on a post on the front <br />bumper of a truck and could be held vertically and <br />aspirated, or held horizontally and operated in an air- <br />craft configuration by driving the truck. The only <br />change in this system was the use of a different ane- <br />mometer to measure airspeed and control the clock <br />rate of the 2D-C. The anemometer was calibrated in a <br />wind tunnel over the range of 0 to 40 m S-I and had <br />