Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, , <br /> <br />TABLE 1: POSSIBLE UPPER BASIN ENTITLEMENTS <br />UNDER THE 1922 COMPACT <br /> <br />Virgin Flows at Lee Ferry <br /> <br />A. Highest Upper 'Basin Delivery Obligation. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Delivery Obligation <br />Article III(d) as written <br />Article III(c) assuming: <br />1.5 MAF deficiency at border <br />Equal split, including losses <br /> <br />Water Available to Upper Basin <br /> <br />B. High Upper Basin Delivery Obligation. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Delivery Obligation <br />Article III(d) as written <br />Article III(c) assuming: <br />1.5 MAF deficiency at border <br />Equal split, excluding losses <br /> <br />Water Available to Upper Basin <br /> <br />C. Lower 'Upper Basin' Delivery Obligation. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Delivery Obligation <br />Article III(d) as written <br />Article III (c) assuming no <br />deficiency <br /> <br />Water Available to Upper Basin <br /> <br />D. Lowest'Upper'Basin Delivery Obligation. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Delivery Obligation <br />Article III(d) reformed <br />(equal split: Lee Ferry virgin <br />flows - Mexico obligation) <br />Article III{c) reformed <br />(equal split of Mexico obligation) <br /> <br />Water Available to Upper Basin <br /> <br />-l5- <br /> <br />MAF/yr. <br /> <br />13.5 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />.90 <br />8.40 <br /> <br />5.10 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />.75 <br />8.25 <br /> <br />5.25 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />0.0 <br /> <br />6.0 <br /> <br />6.0 <br />.75 <br /> <br />6.75 <br /> <br />15.0 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />.90 <br />8.40 <br />6.60 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />.75 <br />8.25 <br /> <br />6.75 <br /> <br />7.5 <br />0.0 <br /> <br />7.5 <br /> <br />./;.. . <br />," <br /> <br />6.75 <br /> <br />.75 <br /> <br />7.50 <br />