My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Fort Morgan WCPlan 2008
CWCB
>
Water Conservation
>
DayForward
>
Fort Morgan WCPlan 2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2010 11:22:55 AM
Creation date
4/17/2008 11:52:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Conservation
Project Type
Water Conservation Plan
Applicant
City of Fort Morgan
Project Name
City of Fort Morgan Water Conservation Plan
Title
City of Fort Morgan Water Conservation Plan
Date
4/17/2008
County
Morgan
Water Conservation - Doc Type
Complete Plan
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historically,water usage predictionswere established usingpopulation growth projections.For <br />example, if the City were to double its population, it was thought reasonable to assume that <br />water usage would also double. This approach does not take into account the mix of <br />Commercial and Industrial customers, which are historically high water users. <br />Table 2b – Potable Water Use byCustomer Type from 1995 to 2006 <br />YearResidentialCargillCommercial,Total PotableAnnual % <br />Outside City(MG)Change <br />(MG)(MG)& Irrig. (MG) (MG) <br />19954965031721,171N.A. <br />19965675751971,33914.3% <br />19975515591911,301-2.8% <br />19985135201781,211-6.9% <br />1999422428146996-17.8% <br />20006165732051,39440.0% <br />20015815021861,270-8.9% <br />20025375701901,2972.1% <br />2003284444125853-34.2% <br />2004429372279108021.0% <br />200542952917011284.3% <br />200647556819312368.7% <br />These figures reflect potable water deliveries to the end user of the City’s customers. Reliable <br />historical data exist only at the influent meter measurements at theWater Treatment Plant, <br />reduced by a 1% treatment plant loss and a 6% distribution system loss to arrive at the total <br />potable delivers shown. An analysis of water use for a water rate study prepared in 2000 was <br />used to determine proportions of potable water delivered to residential, commercial and <br />irrigation customers and to Cargill Meat Solutions. <br />Residentialusers have historically accounted for about 42% of total potable water deliveries, the <br />largest users next to Cargill Meat Solutions.Total potable water demands rose 19% from 1995 <br />to 2000, the peak year, with a sharp decline in 2003 primarily due to drought restrictions and a <br />shifting of some of Cargill Meat Solutions’ demands to non-potable groundwater supplies. A <br />sharp increase in water usage was also noted from 1999 to 2000 when the City switched its <br />water supplies from groundwater to C-BT. Average annual growth in potable water demands <br />2 <br />from 1995 through 2006 was 0.485%, roughly a third of the population growth. <br />2 <br /> Water Supplies and Demands for Participants in the Northern Integrated Supply Project, Harvey Economics, March <br />30, 2006, Appendix H, Page H2. <br />City of Fort Morgan Water Conservation PlanPage 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.