My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12883
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:46:59 PM
Creation date
4/17/2008 11:44:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8451.200
Description
Laramie River Cases
State
CO
Date
8/1/1951
Author
H.T. Person and R.M. Gilsersleeve
Title
Report on Use of Water, Laramie River Basin in Coolorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />',,- <br /> <br />REPOOT ON USE OF WATER <br />LARAMIE RIVER BASIN IN CCLORADO <br />H. T. Person and R. M. Gildersleeve <br />August 1951 <br /> <br />For a long period of years there have been diversions from the Iaramie <br /> <br />River and tributaries in Colorado, for the irrigation of the hay meadows and <br /> <br />PJ,sture lands within the natural basin, and also for use on lands lying outside <br /> <br />the basin. The latter diversions have been made by several ditches across the <br /> <br />divide and a tunnel discharging into the Cache La Poudre basin. The largest and <br /> <br />most important of the transmountain works are the S~line ditch and the Laramie- <br /> <br />Poudre tunnel. <br /> <br />The existing collection facilities for the tunnel were generally being used. <br /> <br />about 1929 or 1930. Frior to the end of the 1938 irrigation season, the trans- <br /> <br />mountain diversionists exported out of the basin such amounts of water as were <br /> <br />available to them under the limitation by United States Supreme Court decrees of <br /> <br />33,500 acre feet annually for the tunnel and S~line, and an additional rela- <br /> <br />tively small amottrlt for other transbasin works. <br /> <br />Also, until the end of the 1938 season, although the Supreme Court had lim- <br /> <br />ited the right of the meadowland ditches to "divert and taken from the stream <br /> <br />an amount of 4,250 acre feet per annum, these ditches freely diverted such <br /> <br />amounts of water as their users considered necessary for the irrigation of their <br /> <br />lands. <br /> <br />During the years 1939, 1940 and 1941 there vms a competitive race for water <br /> <br />between the meadlowland users and the transmountain diversionists, in accordance <br /> <br />with rulings of the Courts that there had been in effect a mass allocation to the <br /> <br />Colorado water users of 39,750 acre feet per annum, and that the two classes of <br /> <br />users could divert in the amounts of their respective priorities until that total <br /> <br />amount had been diverted. In 1939, however, after all headgates had been closed <br />by Colorado officials at the time when 39,750 acre feet had been diverted, the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.