My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00412
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:38:42 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 11:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Final Report on Utah Cloud Seeding Experimentation Using Propane During the 2003/04 Winter
Date
3/1/2005
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />separation, aircraft instrumentation sometimes detected one or both plumes and sometimes overflew <br />them. In other words, aircraft sampling was typically near plume tops. Because no aircraft sampling was <br />practical during the 2003/04 experiments, and because of expected veering of the wind with altitude, the <br />aircraft observations have not been considered here. These are mentioned because they documented that <br />plumes released from the site 4 km south of the HAS were typically further south than could be sampled <br />by the instrumented van, that is, more than 2.5 km south of the TAR. An instrumented observatory was <br />maintained during early 1994 very near the southern end of the upwind highway. It provided continuous <br />surface observations of AgI while the van and aircraft were sampling. Holroyd et al. (1995) presented a <br />detailed case study of the southern plume which shows it meandered back and forth, sometimes detected <br />at the surface observatory, and sometimes south of it, depending on the wind direction. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The five days with isolated HAS-released plumes ofSF6 crossing the upwind highway provided a total <br />of 42 van traverses (passes) through the SF6 gas plume. Seven of these were rejected because oflow peak <br />SF6 concentrations and associated narrow plume widths, likely related to limitations in instrument <br />sensitivity. There were problems with SF6 release rates during some of the rejected cases, or SF6 release <br />had terminated shortly before the passes. Typical SF6 plume peak concentrations exceeded 500 parts per <br />trillion (ppt) by volume, with several near or above 1000 ppt. But six of the rejected plumes wer,e below <br />100 ppt and the seventh reject was 190 ppt. The next lowest value was over 310 ppt, providing a natural <br />breakpoint for accepting or rejecting plumes for further analysis. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> Pass 21 of 27 Feb 94 <br /> 600 Concentration of SF6 <br /> released from HAS V5. <br /> N-S Distance from TAR <br /> 500 <br />~ <br />Q. <br />.eo <br />c <br />0 <br />:p 400 <br />g <br />c <br />B <br />c <br />0 <br /><.> 300 <br />t/) <br />~ <br />If <br />U) <br /> 200 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />-2.0 <br /> <br />-1.0 0.0 1.0 <br />Kilometers North or South from TAR <br /> <br />2.0 <br /> <br />3.0 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Fig. 3. An example ofSF6 tracer gas plume detection by the passage of an instrumented van on 21 Febmary 1994. <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.