My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00398
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:35 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 11:05:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Project Skywater
Title
Precipitation Management and the Environment - An Overview of the Skywater IX Conference
Date
9/1/1977
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />I -~, <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />What value system is it appropriate to apply in assessing vegetational changes? How does risk <br />of weeds relate to rate of change of climate? Are weeds and pests a greater problem in moist <br />climates, or in dry ones? <br />Animals.-As precipitation management operates through more and more complex chains of <br />cause-and-effect, in combination with more and more other independent sources of <br />disturbance, how can we handle the intermingling of precipitation-management-related impacts <br />with others? What is the relationship to alternatives for animal management, such as feeding <br />the elk? <br />Societal.-Since the anticipated precipitation changes are not expected to change the <br />structure or functioning of societal institutions, the issues relate to derivative impacts. Can we <br />methodically and rationally predict changes in societal institutions and their functioning that <br />would result indirectly from precipitation management? Can sociology model social responses <br />to precipitation management to a degree of precision useful for prediction of behavior? Should <br />Skywater adopt the goals and methods of this model concept? Can we identify and quantify <br />stresses and responses by societal institutions to precipitation management? Can benefits and <br />disbenefits to individuals be identified? Can the disbenefited be compensated? How should <br />costs be distributed? To what extent do responses such as the scapegoat reflex spring from the <br />nature of precipitation management, and to what extent from preexisting cleavages in society? <br />How can they be mitigated? <br />Seeding agents.-Should the need for silver monitoring be reassessed and purposes and <br />methods redefined? What are the needs for further research on biospheric impacts? Should <br />studies be made of areas long impacted by industrial silver contamination? What issues should <br />monitoring be designed to resolve? How widespread and how sensitive need monitoring be? <br />Environmental overview ,-What priority should be assigned environmental issues of <br />precipitation management in comparison with other environmental issues affecting the same <br />regions and in comparison with other aspects of precipitation management? How may <br />resources for investigation be justified and obtained? How should assessment of <br />precipitation-management-related impacts be considered in relation to assessment of other <br />generally much more powerful impacts on the same environmental system? What is the validity <br />and limitations of an investigatory method relying on extrapolation from the effects of greatly <br />exaggerated impacts, that is, increasing snowpack tenfold by means of snow fences? How <br />should we bridge from studying impacts on organisms to assessing impacts on ecosystems and <br />environments? <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.