My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00398
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00398
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:35 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 11:05:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Project Skywater
Title
Precipitation Management and the Environment - An Overview of the Skywater IX Conference
Date
9/1/1977
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
205
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />D. Those three basic parameters then become the inputs to abiotic models <br />from which base conditions and changes thereto can be predicted using <br />state-of-the-art technology. <br />E. It is assumed that the current state-of-the-art will allow relative <br />quantification adequate to meet current institutional requirements. <br />This, however, may fall short of abiotic analyses requirements for <br />some biological purposes. Total quantification is beyond the current <br />state-of-the-art and will no doubt be so for some time in the future. <br />F. Environmental impacts attributed to weather modification can best be <br />evaluated by considering departures from a defined baseline or pretreat- <br />ment condition. Such evaluation, however, further assumes aqequacy <br />of inputs from expected hydrometeoric events in terms of frequency, <br />amount, and intensity. This assumption is applicable to both short- <br />term and long-term conditions. <br /> <br />Methodology <br /> <br />The methodology used was to first identify those issues that are pertinent <br /> <br />to the abiotic system, subject to the assumptions stated above. Factors <br /> <br />associated with these issues were then revie~red and summarized. Throughout <br /> <br />the workshop, only process oriented approaches were followed since this <br /> <br />allows one to perform a comparative analysis between "pretreatment conditions" <br /> <br />and those created as a result of intentional precipitation enhancement. <br /> <br />In a process oriented approach, it is fi.rst necessary to define conditions <br /> <br />prior to precipitation augmentation. Without. pretreatment conditions first being <br /> <br />defined only subjective analysis of impacts are possible. <br /> <br />Pretreatment or baseline conditions are not easily or readily established, <br /> <br />since both biotic and abiotic systems are dynamic rather than static. The <br /> <br />establishment of baseline conditions should be done in conjunction with the <br /> <br />weather modification program design. This would apply to the initial research <br /> <br />projects, through pilot and demonstration programs, and ultimately to operational <br /> <br />programs. <br /> <br />If program administrators find that basE~line pretreatment conditions have <br /> <br />not been determined for potential seeding areas, then this should take a top <br /> <br />priority for further research. Any weather modification program, research or <br /> <br />operational, without baseline quantification would be significantly weakened. <br /> <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.