Laserfiche WebLink
<br />rates at least an order of magnitude greater than cloud seeding can reasonably be expected ever to <br />attain, has indicated concern over silver as an environmental pollutant. Finally, the seeding-agents <br />group has recommended an effort at public education to allay the fears aroused by past <br />speculation. <br />A further task of evaluation that needs to be accomplished is to scope some of the remaining <br />speculations. If dry ice contaminated with amides might be harmful, what is the chance that one <br />might find dry ice contaminated with amides? What process of physical concentration might be <br />envisaged that could elevate the silver concentration significantly above background? What is <br />known about potentiation of other heavy metals by silver, in what sorts of processes, and with .i <br />what sorts of results, that might be looked for in areas of past heavy industrial contamination of <br />silver? Lacking such information, the fruits of speculation are unripe and are likely to be thought <br />sour. <br />With this changed perspective, the role of Skywater is likely to turn mainly toward <br />coordination with agencies concerned with the higher silver levels resulting from industrial and <br />agricultural contamination, accompanied by monitoring directed principally at identification of <br />cloud-seeding silver in precipitation itself rather than in parts of the environment where the <br />background is very much higher and more variable. <br />The second level of conclusions and recommendations is that of concerns for indirect effects <br />coming about as a consequence of development, with increased population, increased industry, <br />increased cropland, etc. <br />There has as yet been no identification or analysis of processes. The connection seems perhaps <br />to have been made backward rather than forward, from deep and widespread concern about the <br />issue of development toward any object that swims into the field of sensitivity created by that <br />concern, whether the connection is explicitly described or only assumed. The existence of these <br />concerns, their depth, and their pervasiveness must be acknowledged. We cannot afford to ignore <br />them. We must be responsive and responsible in our reaction to them. But how? <br />Population, industry, agriculture, and ranching, as well as other environmental changes in the <br />United States have a history of great dynamicism, of great sweeps of change that have run their <br />course or been obliterated by new and different sweeps. While the sweeping changes have been <br />forced to accommodate themselves in some measure to the realities of climate, there is little <br />indication that climate has played an appreciable role in initiating these changes, or that it will do <br />so in the foreseeable future. It is water demand, not water availability, that has set the tempo for <br />water development. <br />Skywater will heed the message. Plainly, many people are deeply concerned over what <br />development (in its many manifestations) is doing to the quality of life. If there were not <br />heightened awareness of the problem, and heightened concern for the future, the issue would <br />scarcely have arisen at the conference. And somewhere in this broad land there must be those <br />who are striving to understand better what makes development tick and how it may <br />be controlled. It behooves us to discover who these people are, to get in touch with them, and to ~ <br />learn enough about their work to discover whether or not the kind of input that precipitation <br />management might make is or might be important to the processes they are studying. After all, a <br />managed decrease in precipitation is a reasonable possibility; and if the effect of a managed water <br />shortage on development were calculable and significant, this might become a tool for <br /> <br />28 <br />