Laserfiche WebLink
<br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />This study was accomplished to assist the Bureau <br />of Reclamation's Regional Offices in evaluating <br />proposed candidate sites for possible wind turbine <br />projects in meeting their project power needs. <br /> <br /><; <br /> <br />In response to an urgent need for additional <br />electrical power in the west, the Bureau was <br />directed, in 1976, to consider the use of wind- <br />power systems to augment the power output of <br />its existing hydroelectric facilities. The initial <br />study results were promising; therefore, Congress <br />authorized funding of the first two-system verifi- <br />cation wind-turbine units and a detailed feasibili- <br />ty study of a 1 OO-MW project at Medicine Bow, <br />Wyoming. The Department of Energy asked the <br />Bureau of Reclamation and othe~ Federal Power <br />Agencies to consider the possibility of construct- <br />ing five or more wind turbine projects having a <br />total installed capacity of up to 500-MW. With <br />these potential cost sharing opportunities and <br />the Bureau's need for low cost project power, <br />which would be paid back with interest, the wind <br />site prospecting program was initiated to assist <br />the Regional Offices in establishing which other <br />sites would be the best for construction of other <br />wind turbine projects, in addition to the Medicine <br />Bow Project. This report discusses the prelimi- <br />nary results of this study comparing the various <br />sites that were monitored using PROBE (Portable <br />Remote OBservations of the Environment) sta- <br />tions. For a complete comparison of all sites, this <br />data must be compared with data being obtained <br />by the Regional Offices at these and other sites <br />that are also being monitored, [1, 2]'. The results <br />indicate that there are at least five or six other <br />sites in this group in addition to the Medicine <br />Bow site that warrant further consideration. <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />The Bureau of Reclamation's DARR (Division of <br />Atmospheric Resources Research) and its con- <br />tractors have developed specifications for a hydro- <br />meteorological data-collection network to support <br />research in conjunction with Project Skywater <br />programs, such as the HIPLEX (High Plains Co- <br />operative Program), SCPP (Sierra Cooperative <br />Pilot Project), and CREST (Colorado River En- <br />hanced Snowpack Test). The network stations <br />were acronymed PROBE, which stands for Port- <br />able, Remote OBservations of the Environment. <br /> <br />1 Numbers in brackets refer to entries in Bibliography, <br /> <br />Prior research and analysis indicated the need for <br />an automatic network providing information for <br />(1) near real-time, short-term prediction (0 to 3 <br />hours) of convective activity, (2) quantitative esti- <br />mates of convergence for use in developing fore- <br />cast variables and covariates of convective precipi- <br />tation, (3) input to and verification of mesoscale <br />numerical models, and (4) development of a better <br />understanding of mesoscale convective interac- <br />tion and triggering mechanisms. <br /> <br />Each station records temperature, relative hu- <br />midity, pressure, wind speed, wind direction, and <br />precipitation. Each provides either 2-minute or <br />5-minute averaged data; and 1-hour observations <br />are stored in the data collection platform. At a <br />specified time each hour, the data are transmitted <br />to the GOES (Geosynchronous Operations En- <br />vironmental Satellite) andthen tothe DARR Direct <br />Reading Ground Station in Denver, <br />Colorado. The data can be accessed immediately <br />by field personnel through telephone networks. <br /> <br />It was concluded that the PROBE stations would <br />be an ideal tool for remote monitoring of wind for <br />the Wind Site Prospecting Program. The cost of <br />the stations were shared by the Division of <br />Research, Department of Energy, and the Bureau <br />Regional Offices. Since the average hourly power <br />density is nearly as accurate using a 5-minute <br />average every 15 minutes, as from a continous <br />5-minute average, the former method is used <br />because it requires less solar photovoltaic power <br />by the PROBE station. <br /> <br />The following is a list of the wind sites that have <br />been, or are presently being, monitored. The ap- <br />proximate location of these sites are shown in <br />figure 1. A typical monthly wind site report is <br />shown in appendix B. These monthly reports are <br />combined into an annual report as shown in <br />appendix C. <br /> <br />PLATFORM <br /> <br />The PROBE physical platform is a freestanding, <br />high windload structure made of lightweight <br />aluminum, as shown in figure 2. It consists of a <br />6,86-meter tripod mast, a lockable NEMA 12 <br />enclosure, and an armor shielding for protection <br />of the electronics package. The tripod mast, with <br />integral guy wires, is designed to limit mast whip <br />to less than :t 5 centimeters. The aluminum <br />structure provides support for the NEMA 12 <br />enclosure, the vane-aspirated temperature shield, <br />wind sensors, solar panels, and antennas. The <br />NEMA 12 enclosure houses the HANDAR Data <br />