Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />,I, <br />I <br />I, <br />I <br />II, <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 2.1 <br /> <br />Figure 2.2 <br /> <br />Figure 3.1 <br /> <br />Figure 3.2 <br /> <br />Figure 3.3 <br /> <br />Figure 3.4 <br />Figure 3.5 <br />Figure 3.6 <br />Figure 3.7 <br />Figure 3.8 <br /> <br />Figure 3.9 <br /> <br />Figure 4.1 <br /> <br />Figure 4.2 <br /> <br />Figure 4.3 <br /> <br />FIGURES <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />Eastern TVA region showing the four priority target <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />areas . . . <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . . . . . . <br /> <br />Topography of the eastern TVA region as shown by colOr <br />scale on top of the figure. Primary measurement sites <br />referred to in the text are annotated on the figures. 6 <br /> <br />Precipitation totals falling above Chattanooga for the <br />three spring months from 1970 through 1987. . . . .. 8 <br /> <br />Moisture anomaly for eastern Tennessee plotted by year <br />since 1895 (from Karl and Young, 1987). . . . . 8 <br /> <br />Percentage of normal rainfall above Chattanooga by month <br />for the 6-year study period. . . . . . . 9 <br /> <br />Percentage of normal rainfall above Chattanooga by month <br />for the period 1970-1987. .............. 9 <br /> <br />Frequency distribution of daily rainfall amounts above <br />Chattanooga for March 1982-1987. . .11 <br /> <br />Same as Fi'g. 3.5, only for April. <br /> <br />. . .11 <br /> <br /> <br />.12 <br /> <br />Same as Fig. 3.6, ,only for May. <br /> <br />Correlation between monthly precipitation above <br />Chattanooga (as percent of normal) and the number of pre- <br />cipitation days per month for all years 1982-1987. <br />Linear correlation coefficient shown. ....... .13 <br /> <br />~ Correlation between monthly precipitation above <br />Chattanooga (as percent of normal) and average daily <br />amount per month for each year 1982-1987. Linear corre- <br />lation coefficient shown. . . .. . . . . .13 <br /> <br />Worksheet used to tabulate cloud and synoptic/mesoscale <br />features observed on satellite images. Four 6-hour time <br />blocks were used to summarize the results as shown in <br />upper right of figure. ............... 16 <br /> <br />GOES 1 km resolution,visible satellite image showing <br />example of cloud category called "convective cells". 18 <br /> <br />Same as Fig. 4.2, only showing example cloud category <br />called IIconvective bandll. . . . . . . . . . . . " . . 18 <br /> <br />vi <br />