Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />r <br />I <br />I <br />.f <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Table 3.1 <br /> <br />Table 3.2 <br /> <br />Table 4.1 <br /> <br />Table 4.2 <br /> <br />Table 5.1 <br /> <br />Table 6.1 <br /> <br />Table 6.2 <br /> <br />Table 6.3 <br /> <br />Table 8.1 <br /> <br />Table 8.2 <br /> <br />Table 8.3 <br /> <br />Table 8.4 <br /> <br />Table 9.1 <br />Table 9.2 <br /> <br />TABLES <br /> <br />Mean monthly precipitation above Chattanooga as observed <br />during the 1970's and for the 6-year period of this <br /> <br />study. . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />............. <br /> <br />Precipitation categories used to stratify amounts above <br /> <br />Chattanooga. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Comparisons of satellite cloud categories and synoptic <br />categories with daily precipitation averages for the <br />basin above Chattanooga. . . . . . . . . . . .' . . . . . <br /> <br />Summary of various echo characteristics observed by the <br />Bristol radar for the 6-year study. '. . . . <br /> <br />Days with observed' or expected rime-icing at Flattop Mtn. <br />and Grandfather Mtn. by months. ...... . . . . <br /> <br />GPCM summary output for March, April, May. . . . <br /> <br />Satellite observed convective days versus GPCM predicted <br />dynamic growth potential days. ..... <br /> <br />Onset day of diurnal convective cycle over eastern <br /> <br />TVA region. ......... e. . . . . . <br /> <br />Comparison of Runoff Suspension Thresholds and Runoff and <br />Turbine Capacities for Selected Reservoirs. ....... <br /> <br />Listing of actual inflow statistics and model input values <br />by week for the eleven projects (reservoirs) augmented. <br />Values in cubic feet per second. . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Sum of historic weekly inflows and percentage increases <br />resulting from simulated cloud seeding in the eastern <br />TVA region. Values shown are listed by model year. <br />Inflow units are TWSF (thousand-week-second-feet) for the <br />eleven augmented reservoirs. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />Amounts and percentage increases in energy calculated by <br />the weekly scheduling model (HYOROSIM). Values shown are <br />listed by model year. Energy increases are in units of <br />MWH (Megawatt-hours). .................. <br /> <br />Schedule of instrumentation/facilities in the field. . <br /> <br />Instrumentation desirable for proposed cloud physics <br /> <br />aircraft. .............. . . . . <br /> <br />v <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />33 <br /> <br />37 <br /> <br />70 <br />79 <br /> <br />81 <br /> <br />83 <br /> <br />91 <br /> <br />94 <br /> <br />101 <br /> <br />102 <br />119 <br /> <br />121 <br />