My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00318 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00318 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:54 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 2:39:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project
Title
A Comparison of Seeded and Nonseeded Orographic Cloud Simulations with and Explicit Cloud Model
Prepared By
Michael P. Meyers, Paul J. DeMott and William R. Cotton
Date
4/4/1995
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />APRIL 1995 <br /> <br />MEYERS ET AL. <br /> <br />837 <br /> <br />can be reasonably well approximated by the continuous <br />gamma distributions as shown in Fig. 2. These gamma <br />functions with shape parameter equal to 2 are of the <br />form <br /> <br />f(D) = :~ exp( - ~) , (3.1) <br /> <br />where D is diameter and Dn is the scaling diameter. It <br />was determined that Dn = 2.7 X 10-6 cm provides an <br />excellent fit for the AgI-AgCl PSD from DeMott et al. <br />( 1983), while Dn = 1.5 X 10-6 is probably more char- <br />acteristic of an aircraft generator PSD. <br />The composite aircraft generator PSD was selected <br />for the mesoscale model simulations as the most likely <br />AgI-AgCl size distribution present following seeding <br />on 18 December 1986. The consequence on ice for- <br />mation compared to the use of the published ground <br />generator PSD is demonstrated through the use of mi- <br />crophysical parcel model simulations later in this sec- <br />tion. In integrating DeMott's equations over the se- <br />lected PSD, environmental dependencies on temper- <br />ature, ice supersaturation, and water supersaturation <br />were retained, and the results for each ice formation <br />mechanism were fit to a computationally efficient <br />polynomial. <br />The total aerosol fraction nucleating ice by deposi- <br />tion Fdep was found to be <br /> <br />(273.16 - T) <br />Fdep = a(Si - 1) + b To + C(Si - 1)2 <br /> <br />(273.16 - T)2 <br />+ d To + e(Si - 1)3, (3.2) <br /> <br />with constants To = 10.0 K, a = -3.25 X 10-3, b <br />= 5.39 X 10-5, C = 4.35 X 10-2, d = 1.55 X 10-4, <br />and e = -0.07. Here Si is the ice saturation ratio, Tis <br />in kelvins, and this equation was taken to be valid when <br />Si > 1.04 and T <= 268.2 K. The total aerosol fraction <br />nucleating ice by condensation freezing Fcdf was pa- <br />rameterized as <br /> <br />(268.66 - T)3 2 <br />Fedf = a To (Sw - 1) , <br /> <br />with constants To = 10.0 K, a = 900.0. This result was <br />taken to be valid when T < 268.66 K and water sat- <br />uration ratio Sw > 1.0. In a similar way, for the im- <br />mersion-freezing nucleation fraction Fimf, it was found <br />that <br /> <br />(3.3 ) <br /> <br />( 268.2 - T)b <br />Fimf = a(Fimm) To ' <br /> <br />(3.4 ) <br /> <br />with To = 10.0 K, a = 0.0274, and b = 3.3, valid for <br />T < 268.2 K. The use of this equation, however, also <br />requires the knowledge of the fraction of nonactivated <br />aerosol immersed in drops at any time and location <br />(Fimm). This would be difficult to follow explicitly in <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br /> <br />28 <br /> <br />III <br />W <br />.J <br />~ 15 <br />I- <br />a: <br />([ <br />II. <br />I- <br />Z <br />~ 18 <br />a: <br />w <br />II. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />8.B <br /> <br />1.2 <br /> <br />1.6 <br /> <br />2 <br />(X le-6) <br /> <br />8.4 <br /> <br />DIAMETER (em) <br /> <br />FIG. 2. Particle size distributions for airborne and <br />ground-based measurements. <br /> <br />a mesoscale model with bulk microphysics. Fortu- <br />nately, the analysis of the relative contributions ofthe <br />different ice formation mechanisms for AgI-AgCl <br />aerosols made later in this section justified the omission <br />of immersion-freezing nucleation from the mesoscale <br />seeding simulation. The equation is presented here for <br />the sake of completeness. <br />For contact-freezing nucleation, a parameterization <br />was sought that would be compatible with the way that <br />cloud water and scavenging of aerosols by cloud water <br />are treated in RAMS. Namely, cloud droplet number <br />concentration is fixed, cloud droplet diameter is al- <br />lowed to vary, and aerosol size is fixed at one value. <br />The geometric mean diameter of the artificial ice nuclei <br />was taken as 2 X 10 -6 cm for use in calculating col- <br />lection rates by cloud droplets in RAMS. Rather than <br />using the activity of this average size, the fraction of <br />the total AgI-AgCl aerosol population potentially ac- <br />tive as contact-freezing nuclei (Fetf) was estimated by <br />integrating the size-dependent equation given by <br />DeMott ( 1994) over the selected size distribution. This <br />gave <br /> <br />Fctf= Fseav[a + b(Si - 1) + C(Si - 1)2 + d(Si - 1)3 <br /> <br />+ e(Si - 1)4 + f(Si - 1)5 + g(Si - 1)6), (3.5) <br /> <br />where the constants are given by a = 0.0878, b <br />= -3.7947, C = 52.3167, d = -255.4484, e = 568.3257, <br />f= -460.4234, and g = -63.1248. The term Fscav is <br />the fraction of the total aerosol population scavenged <br />by cloud droplets in a given grid volume in one time <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.