My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00311 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00311 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:20 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 2:38:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Climatologies and Intercomparisons of Rawinsonde Data Collected During Winter Storm Periods in Utah
Date
8/1/1980
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~~ ~ - <br /> <br />,;r~ <br /> <br />a mixing ratio of 3 gKg-1 at cloud base has been used as a <br />lower limi t . <br /> <br />For item three, bounds of cloud top temperature between <br />-10 anq -30oC were suggested for conditions with insufficient <br />natural freezing nuclei available to start the precipitation <br />process. Cloud top temperature is chosen as an index of the <br />. naturally occurring materials in the atmosphere which will <br />serve as freezing nuclei. It is known tha.t the acti vi ty of <br />such materials increase as temperatures decrease. <br /> <br />The bounds for item four were derived from consideration <br />of the barrier's configuration, cloud depth, wind speed and <br />direction, and the velocity at which the precipitation particles <br />fall. Under conditions with high cloud tops and strong wind <br />speeds normal to the barrier, the precipitation particles <br />could be blown over the crest and evaporate in lee-side downdrafts <br />causing a decrease in precipitation across the barrier. <br /> <br />Recently, evidence has been presented which indicates <br />tha t some of the limits suggested by the Vardiman and Moore <br />study might be subject to question. Accord.ing to Hill (1980) <br />the atmospheric sampling equipment which was used in the research <br />programs,prior to 1973 produced errors in humidity measurements <br />during daytime rawinsonde data collection due to a lack of <br />adequa te shielding from solar radiation. Hill contends. that <br />these errors caused much of the daytime sound:Lng data to indicate <br />warmer cloud tops than actually occurred and could have biased <br />the apparent reults. Hill's concerns appear justified and <br />it would seem that additional analysis of the data used in <br />Vardiman and Moore's study, perhaps using only nighttime sounding <br />data, would be in order to resolve the question. The concepts <br />presented by Vardiman and Moore are, however, not in question. <br />2-6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.