Laserfiche WebLink
<br />available for conversion to precipi ta tion, 3) the ice nuclei <br />supply available for precipi ta tion . ini tia tion, and, 4) the <br />time available for nucleation growth and fallout of precipi ta tion. <br /> <br />Various physical and empirical measures of these four <br />basic categories were accumulated for the six project areas <br />and subsequently related to precipitation and ultimatel~r the <br />effects of seeding. Seeding effects were generalized to cover <br />the data from the six individual projects in terms of multi-par- <br />ameter "seeding windows" - derived primarily from rawinsonde <br />information normally collected just upwind of the associated <br />target areas. These windows were developed to identify positive <br />and nega ti ve seeding effects for three general regions over <br />a mountain barrier - upwind, crest, 'and downwind. <br /> <br />Consideration of these physical categories in making <br />opera tional seeding decisions is not a new concept.. However, <br />the study provided tentative bounds for selected air mass <br />parameters and' combinations thereof that appeared to maximize <br />the seeding effect in the barrier crest area. <br /> <br />The bounds suggested for the air mass parameters in the <br />above study, although tentative, have been used as guidance <br />in making operational seeding decisions on the Utah seeding <br />program. For item one, the low level stability must allow <br />the vertical mixing of the ground released nuclei (silver <br />iodide particles) into suitable clouds. <br /> <br />For item two, a minimum cloud base water content was <br />suggested. This restriction based upon a statistical analysis <br />of the six research programs can be interpreted in a physical <br />sense as a requirement for fairly moist cloud conditions before <br />seeding can produce a posi ti ve effect. For the Utah project <br />2-5 <br /> <br />".~;.:~..",*~ <br />